What’s in a Name?

The iPad. Unless you were in a coma, you probably heard about the launch of Apple’s new tablet. A larger version of the iPhone, at 0.5 inches thick, 1.5 pounds, $499 (base model) + a $29.99 unlimited data plan, it’s pretty impressive. You can read all …

The iPad. Unless you were in a coma, you probably heard about the launch of Apple’s new tablet. A larger version of the iPhone, at 0.5 inches thick, 1.5 pounds, $499 (base model) + a $29.99 unlimited data plan, it’s pretty impressive. You can read all about the reveal and product specs over on Engadget, who covered it live.

There’s an interesting subplot going on here, though. The hype around the event was palpable – even the Wall Street Journal noted “Last time there was this much excitement about a tablet, it had some commandments written on it.” Indeed, everyone was speculating about the name of the new netbook from Apple – from the iTablet to iSlate. When it was revealed, it looked like nothing more than an oversize iPhone, but as the presentation went on, the functionality became more apparent.

Without a doubt, the tech community – which always gets in a tizzy whenever Apple releases a new product (or if Steve Jobs sneezes) – was so prolific in its buzz that it locked up Twitter for a bit. There’s really something to be said about the power of the geeky masses, as words related to the presentation (including Amazon’s Kindle, which was mentioned in Job’s announcement) accounted for 8 of the 10 trending topics on Twitter at one point.

You’ve got to wonder about the naming decision on this product. It’s certainly in line with the “iP” naming convention of the other two wildly successful product lines, the iPod and iPhone. So from a brand extension, it makes sense. But my first inclination was that “iPad” was too close to “iPod.” Surely iTablet or iSlate would have worked from a descriptive standpoint. It led me to wonder if there was something more going on here…

Look carefully at the trending topics for a clue – in addition to phrases like Apple, iBooks, Steve Jobs, Kindle, iPhone, iWork and iSlate, there was as single outlier: iTampon. Check that again – iPad doesn’t even show up on the trending topics!

“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose / By any other name would smell as sweet.”

Romeo and Juliet (II, ii, 1-2)

Did Apple anticipate such a viral phenomenon that they intentionally named the product as they did? Or were they completely naive about the implications? Either way, it’s lighting up the web as we speak. And it didn’t take long for someone to photoshop it, either:
What do you think? Marketing savvy, stunt or stupidity?

UPDATE: @brennanMKE sent me this video – an old iPad commercial:

Photo credits: Engadget, @Katmanalac



Is Amazon.com Cloaking : Serving Google Different Content?

A WebmasterWorld thread has someone asking if what Amazon is doing, is considered cloaking. First let me show you what they are doing.

Go to this page on Amazon.com. Notice, at the top right of the results is a “Sort by” drop down. Here is a picture:

Amazon Cloaking?

Now, go to the Google Cached version of that page:

Amazon Cloaking?

Yes, it is not there. It seems like Amazon served Google the page without the sorting feature, which technically is a form of cloaking. But is this done with intent to artificially boost their rankings?

The content seems exactly identical, minus just the sort by feature. The sort by feature can produce duplicate content and make it harder for Google to index the incredibly large site. Is this being done in a way that is trying to hide something?

If they really want to be white on white – they could now keep the sort by there and use the canonical tag for all the sort by options. But this might be something Amazon has doen for years prior to the canonical tag coming out?

Personally, I wouldn’t consider this against Google’s cloaking guidelines, but I am not Google.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


A WebmasterWorld thread has someone asking if what Amazon is doing, is considered cloaking. First let me show you what they are doing.

Go to this page on Amazon.com. Notice, at the top right of the results is a “Sort by” drop down. Here is a picture:

Amazon Cloaking?

Now, go to the Google Cached version of that page:

Amazon Cloaking?

Yes, it is not there. It seems like Amazon served Google the page without the sorting feature, which technically is a form of cloaking. But is this done with intent to artificially boost their rankings?

The content seems exactly identical, minus just the sort by feature. The sort by feature can produce duplicate content and make it harder for Google to index the incredibly large site. Is this being done in a way that is trying to hide something?

If they really want to be white on white – they could now keep the sort by there and use the canonical tag for all the sort by options. But this might be something Amazon has doen for years prior to the canonical tag coming out?

Personally, I wouldn’t consider this against Google’s cloaking guidelines, but I am not Google.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.



The Compete Top 50 List – No Surprises Here!

Web Pro News shared some information from Compete.com that lists the top 50 websites in the United States by volume of visitors.
Here is the actual Top 50 Website List:

Here are a few observations on the list:

The No. 1 site on the list is no surprise: Google
4 of the top 10 sites are search engines [...]

Web Pro News shared some information from Compete.com that lists the top 50 websites in the United States by volume of visitors.

Here is the actual Top 50 Website List:

Here are a few observations on the list:

  • The No. 1 site on the list is no surprise: Google
  • 4 of the top 10 sites are search engines (5 if you count You Tube)
  • 3 of the top 10 sites are Microsoft properties
  • 2 of the top 4 sites are Google properties
  • The top 5 sites are all search engines or social media websites
  • The No. 1 e-commerce site on the list is Amazon.com (No. 6)
  • The top 3 e-commerce sites are Amazon.com, eBay and Walmart

Let’s stop right there. Of the top 13 sites, only 4 are not a search engine, social media site or Wikipedia – and one of those is Microsoft.com. This begs the question, what does it take to be a top website (or a highly trafficked one)?

Judging by the list I’d say you need to own the real estate, rent it (all of the top 10 sites are sites that provide a service for others in some manner that allows the owner to benefit from the usability of the masses). Secondly, you’ve got to offer a service with broad appeal. This is an appeal that is much broader than having a niche website. We all know that having a niche website is key to build your business online and is also a must to do very well with you search engine optimziation and search engine marketing efforts.

I believe it will be more and more difficult to break into the top 50 sites, but companies that manage to do so will do if they do all the right things and have a substantial marketing and advertising budgets. Even companies that focus on the best marketing practices, will stand a better chance of being considered a high traffic website, whether they make the top 50 or not, at the end of they day they too can be very successful online.

SEOs Freak Out: Google To Personalize All Search Results

Back in February 2007, Google began personalizing search results based on your search history. Google would do so, only when you were logged in. Now, Google announced they are personalizing search results for everyone, even if you are not logged in.

Google explains:

Previously, we only offered Personalized Search for signed-in users, and only when they had Web History enabled on their Google Accounts. What we’re doing today is expanding Personalized Search so that we can provide it to signed-out users as well. This addition enables us to customize search results for you based upon 180 days of search activity linked to an anonymous cookie in your browser. It’s completely separate from your Google Account and Web History (which are only available to signed-in users). You’ll know when we customize results because a “View customizations” link will appear on the top right of the search results page. Clicking the link will let you see how we’ve customized your results and also let you turn off this type of customization.

This is big stuff for the SEO world. No matter how much we complained earlier that the personalized search results made it hard to “optimize” for, this only impacted a fraction of all Google searchers. Most people had no idea how to even log into Google. Now, Google is personalizing results by default and these same people will have no idea how to turn off personalization. So now all these users will see different results, on some level, and it does impact the SEO space – more so than when Google launched this in 2007.

SEOs, most of them, are mad. Let me quote some of the more trusted names in our forums:

Cre8asite Forums:

So let me get this straight: to completely opt-out, you’ll have to login permanently? Which moron came up with that scheme?

Wow… this is really going to overly favor websites like amazon and ebay that already have a huge reach.

The rich will get richer.

HighRankings Forums:

Google is using a “secret cookie” not attached to the Google.com domain to handle the Web History/Personalized Search for users who are not logged in.

The gradual impact over time will be that unaware users who click on Google search listings will reshape their search results. Unless Google develops some sort of injection to show people new (fresh) content, discovery will become more difficult for less sophisticated users.

Good news for Randy and 1dmf’s Google Rank Extractor. And also for moving people further and further away from traditional rank checking as a measure of success.

DigitalPoint Forums:

Google are there to find ways to best meet the needs of the searcher. As much as we want them to be, they are not there to meet our SEO needs.

WebmasterWorld:

The possible impact to all is staggering.

This just feels so very wrong-headed that the mind boggles! As I often explain to IT staff, NOT EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE PROGRAMMED SHOULD BE PROGRAMMED.

Sounds like an attempt at a product improvement. SEOs may or may not like it, but the real question is whether Joe Searcher likes it. If Joe does, Google will remain one big step ahead of its competitors. If Personalized Search turns out to be Google’s answer to Windows Vista, Google will need to bring back Google XP or leapfrog to Google 7.

Danny Sullivan has an excellent write up about this at Search Engine Land, he doesn’t seem to touch on the SEO view of this.

Honestly, if this makes Google more relevant for their searchers – all power to them. I am not going to say I know what is better for the average searcher. They can quickly figure this out after days and decide to keep it, turn it down, or off completely. SEOs will adapt, like they always do – we are a strong and smart bunch – I am not worried.

Forum discussion is plentiful and it is at Cre8asite Forums, HighRankings Forums, DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.



Back in February 2007, Google began personalizing search results based on your search history. Google would do so, only when you were logged in. Now, Google announced they are personalizing search results for everyone, even if you are not logged in.

Google explains:

Previously, we only offered Personalized Search for signed-in users, and only when they had Web History enabled on their Google Accounts. What we’re doing today is expanding Personalized Search so that we can provide it to signed-out users as well. This addition enables us to customize search results for you based upon 180 days of search activity linked to an anonymous cookie in your browser. It’s completely separate from your Google Account and Web History (which are only available to signed-in users). You’ll know when we customize results because a “View customizations” link will appear on the top right of the search results page. Clicking the link will let you see how we’ve customized your results and also let you turn off this type of customization.

This is big stuff for the SEO world. No matter how much we complained earlier that the personalized search results made it hard to “optimize” for, this only impacted a fraction of all Google searchers. Most people had no idea how to even log into Google. Now, Google is personalizing results by default and these same people will have no idea how to turn off personalization. So now all these users will see different results, on some level, and it does impact the SEO space – more so than when Google launched this in 2007.

SEOs, most of them, are mad. Let me quote some of the more trusted names in our forums:

Cre8asite Forums:

So let me get this straight: to completely opt-out, you’ll have to login permanently? Which moron came up with that scheme?

Wow… this is really going to overly favor websites like amazon and ebay that already have a huge reach.

The rich will get richer.

HighRankings Forums:

Google is using a “secret cookie” not attached to the Google.com domain to handle the Web History/Personalized Search for users who are not logged in.

The gradual impact over time will be that unaware users who click on Google search listings will reshape their search results. Unless Google develops some sort of injection to show people new (fresh) content, discovery will become more difficult for less sophisticated users.

Good news for Randy and 1dmf’s Google Rank Extractor. And also for moving people further and further away from traditional rank checking as a measure of success.

DigitalPoint Forums:

Google are there to find ways to best meet the needs of the searcher. As much as we want them to be, they are not there to meet our SEO needs.

WebmasterWorld:

The possible impact to all is staggering.

This just feels so very wrong-headed that the mind boggles! As I often explain to IT staff, NOT EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE PROGRAMMED SHOULD BE PROGRAMMED.

Sounds like an attempt at a product improvement. SEOs may or may not like it, but the real question is whether Joe Searcher likes it. If Joe does, Google will remain one big step ahead of its competitors. If Personalized Search turns out to be Google’s answer to Windows Vista, Google will need to bring back Google XP or leapfrog to Google 7.

Danny Sullivan has an excellent write up about this at Search Engine Land, he doesn’t seem to touch on the SEO view of this.

Honestly, if this makes Google more relevant for their searchers – all power to them. I am not going to say I know what is better for the average searcher. They can quickly figure this out after days and decide to keep it, turn it down, or off completely. SEOs will adapt, like they always do – we are a strong and smart bunch – I am not worried.

Forum discussion is plentiful and it is at Cre8asite Forums, HighRankings Forums, DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.



Google Drops “Search within results” Search Box?

Back in March 2008, Google began testing search boxes in the search results, it was later seen more often as Google began to like the tests they have seen from it.

Now, it seems like it is gone for most queries. I still see it for a search on new york times, but it is gone for searches like amazon.com or ebay.

Here is an older picture of how that looked:

Google Search Box Within Search Box

Now, this box does not show up.

There are some complaints about this not showing up for most searches at Google Web Search Help.

Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.


Back in March 2008, Google began testing search boxes in the search results, it was later seen more often as Google began to like the tests they have seen from it.

Now, it seems like it is gone for most queries. I still see it for a search on new york times, but it is gone for searches like amazon.com or ebay.

Here is an older picture of how that looked:

Google Search Box Within Search Box

Now, this box does not show up.

There are some complaints about this not showing up for most searches at Google Web Search Help.

Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.



Top Online Brand Survey – Your Company?

An interesting survey by the Forrester Blog: Google, Yahoo! and Amazon are the most trusted brands online. I’m really not surprised by Google and Amazon, but I’d have thought that Yahoo! lost more ground. They were in second place in 2007 and still hold onto second in 2009 even though they’ve lost ground with consumers. [...]

An interesting survey by the Forrester Blog: Google, Yahoo! and Amazon are the most trusted brands online. I’m really not surprised by Google and Amazon, but I’d have thought that Yahoo! lost more ground. They were in second place in 2007 and still hold onto second in 2009 even though they’ve lost ground with consumers. Amazon gained and still is in third – barely.

If I were to hazard a prediction here, I’d say by the next survey, Amazon will hold second place behind Google and Facebook, Microsoft, and YouTube will all have gained higher recognition with at least one of them possibly passing Yahoo! I also think MySpace will fall off the list and be replaced, possibly by Twitter.

But here’s the question: What does it take to make the list in the first place?
Trustworthiness, helpfulness, and relevance. So does that mean if you develop those three qualities for your website that you’ll stand a chance to be on the list in the next survey? Probably not. But I do think that if you gain a reputation for those three qualities within your niche then you could be one of the most trusted authorities within your niche and industry online. Don’t you think?

Having a trusted brand online goes way beyond a solid search engine optimization and pay per click advertising program, it means your company is truly a leader in your marketplace. For instance, I have a client that is a manufacturer of restaurant equipment. Yes, I have helped them achieve top search engine rankings, a robust pay per click advertising campaign in all three search networks and have even gotten them active in social media. What I have found is that everything performs very well for them online since they have been a true leader in their industry for over 40 years (well before the web existed!). So the point is it takes a good amount of work, energy and innovation that goes way beyond marketing efforts to become a top online brand in a given industry. Are you and your company up for the task?

This Week in Search for 11/12/09

Posted by Sam Niccolls

Five Thumbs

  • Bing Unveils Wolfram|Alpha Powered Search:
    Whether you want to look up nutrition facts or find out your body mass index (perhaps before the holidays), Bing’s Wolfram|Alpha powered results give you the information you want… or don’t want, as the case may be.
  • Amazon Design Analysis:
    Just copy Amazon for e-commerce, right? Well, there are certainly reasons Amazon brought in 19 billion in revenue in 2008, but before you borrow too heavily, Jared Spool’s SlideShare presentation analyzing Amazon design elements is worth a look.

Four Thumbs

  • Win Big by Doing Just a Few Things Well:
    As shown by Chipotle, Pinkberry, and others, simplicity can be an effective path to executing and marketing successful products. It’s difficult to do, but as 37 Signals highlights, often times less is more.

Three Thumbs 

  • Heatmaps for Display Ads & Product Pages:
    Hot or not? … it’s a simple enough question, but few marketers use heatmaps to inform display ads or product pages. As Jonathan Mendez and Linda Bustos each point out, heatmaps are a great way to do like Snoop Dogg and "drop, drop it like it’s hot." 
  • Smart E-mail Marketing Tips:
    Shay Howe’s blog post full of e-mail tips is a useful hit list for marketing managers in charge of designing and delivering effective e-mails.
  • New Google Flu Shot Locator:
    Google moves the local search needle through continued improvements to their flu shot locator, which will soon be added to Flu.gov.

Two Thumbs    

  • Marissa Mayer Named Glamour Magazine Woman of the Year:
    Google’s 34-year-old VP joins Michelle Obama, Maya Angelou, Serena Williams and Rihanna among Glamour Magazine’s women of the year. And yes, the Mozzers currently in Vegas are projecting that our very own Sarah Bird will top Glamour’s list in 2010.
  • Monetizing Mobile Content:
    A timely subject on the heels of Google’s AdMob acquisition, eMarketer’s study sheds light on the growth of U.S. mobile users and ways content owners could monetize mobile users.  

Rocking on YOUmoz

Top YOUmoz entries:

  1. * Web Analytics & Segmentation for Better Conversion Optimization by philou2803

  2. * What Make a Link Worthy Post – Part 2 by chenry

  3. Dear Generation X: Social Media from the Eyes of Your Successors by trycm

  4. Google Analytics Alternatives – Measuring Beyond Last Click Wins by John Santangelo

  5. AdWords Tracking Proven to be Misleading by William E 

  6. Case Study: How Building a Site for Users Improved Our Rankings by csaliba

* Indicates blog post was promoted to the SEOmoz Blog

Do you like this post? Yes No

Posted by Sam Niccolls

Five Thumbs

  • Bing Unveils Wolfram|Alpha Powered Search:
    Whether you want to look up nutrition facts or find out your body mass index (perhaps before the holidays), Bing’s Wolfram|Alpha powered results give you the information you want… or don’t want, as the case may be.
  • Amazon Design Analysis:
    Just copy Amazon for e-commerce, right? Well, there are certainly reasons Amazon brought in 19 billion in revenue in 2008, but before you borrow too heavily, Jared Spool’s SlideShare presentation analyzing Amazon design elements is worth a look.

Four Thumbs

  • Win Big by Doing Just a Few Things Well:
    As shown by Chipotle, Pinkberry, and others, simplicity can be an effective path to executing and marketing successful products. It’s difficult to do, but as 37 Signals highlights, often times less is more.

Three Thumbs 

  • Heatmaps for Display Ads & Product Pages:
    Hot or not? … it’s a simple enough question, but few marketers use heatmaps to inform display ads or product pages. As Jonathan Mendez and Linda Bustos each point out, heatmaps are a great way to do like Snoop Dogg and "drop, drop it like it’s hot." 
  • Smart E-mail Marketing Tips:
    Shay Howe’s blog post full of e-mail tips is a useful hit list for marketing managers in charge of designing and delivering effective e-mails.
  • New Google Flu Shot Locator:
    Google moves the local search needle through continued improvements to their flu shot locator, which will soon be added to Flu.gov.

Two Thumbs    

  • Marissa Mayer Named Glamour Magazine Woman of the Year:
    Google’s 34-year-old VP joins Michelle Obama, Maya Angelou, Serena Williams and Rihanna among Glamour Magazine’s women of the year. And yes, the Mozzers currently in Vegas are projecting that our very own Sarah Bird will top Glamour’s list in 2010.
  • Monetizing Mobile Content:
    A timely subject on the heels of Google’s AdMob acquisition, eMarketer’s study sheds light on the growth of U.S. mobile users and ways content owners could monetize mobile users.  

Rocking on YOUmoz

Top YOUmoz entries:

  1. * Web Analytics & Segmentation for Better Conversion Optimization by philou2803

  2. * What Make a Link Worthy Post – Part 2 by chenry

  3. Dear Generation X: Social Media from the Eyes of Your Successors by trycm

  4. Google Analytics Alternatives – Measuring Beyond Last Click Wins by John Santangelo

  5. AdWords Tracking Proven to be Misleading by William E 

  6. Case Study: How Building a Site for Users Improved Our Rankings by csaliba

* Indicates blog post was promoted to the SEOmoz Blog

Do you like this post? Yes No

This Week in Search for 10/28/09

Posted by Sam Niccolls

 

Five Thumbs

  • Eric Schmidt – What the Internet Will Look Like in 5 Years:
    Google’s CEO takes a look into the future and talks about some of the ways the internet will change, such as Chinese language sites outnumbering English language sites, an increase in the number of digital natives in the tech workforce, and the difficulties search engines have around ranking real-time search.
  • Retailers Going Too Far Tracking Web Habits:
    I’m probably the only person on earth who puts items into his shopping cart and intentionally abandons sites in order to get product discount e-mails a week or two later, but the USA TODAY discusses two issues that are hot button topics for more normal consumers: Cookie usage and behavioral targeting.
  • Grammatically Incorrect Keywords:
    In her Search Engine Journal Post, Susanna Speier talks about how even though grammatically incorrect keywords aren’t going to win you any spelling bees, they might be the ones that’ll make you the most honey, er-um money.

Four Thumbs

  • Halloween E-mails:
    Campaign Monitor’s Halloween E-mail Roundup shows some creative, brand specific examples of Halloween e-mails that’ll give you some last minute idea fodder for this year or things to think about for next year.     
  • Update on Google Rich Snippets:
    Google has been working on better using structured data and expanding rich snippets for a while, but this week’s post on the GWC blog calls attention to improved documentation and tips around their rich snippet testing tool.
  • WSJ – Why E-mail No Longer Rules:
    You may have caught the Wall Street Journal post earlier this month, but if you didn’t, it’s worth a read. The negative backlash across the e-mail industry continues several weeks later.

Three Thumbs  

  • Integrating E-mail with Other Marketing:
    A well executed e-mail is no different from a fine wine… it’s good on it’s own, but it’s better when given the right pairing. In a useful post centered around e-mail marketing, Joel Book addresses how the most successful e-mail initiatives integrate with other marketing efforts.
  • Google Analytics Qualification Test:
    GA has had a more heavyweight certification for agencies for some time, but now available to individual marketers is a test that gives web analytics users personal certifications.
  • Creating a Multi-Cultural Website:
    If you’ve ever tried to market a product internationally, Forrester’s post about the importance of market research when creating a multi-cultural website might strike a nerve. 
  • Google Website Optimizer API Released:
    GWO rolled out a new API, which, depending on your CMS provider, can allow you to create and launch tests without touching any of your website’s code. Pretty useful stuff. Although a major limitation is that the API currently only integrates with two CMS providers.

Two Thumbs

  • Seth Godin – Some People Are Better Than Others:
    The short post about customer types earns a spot in this weeks roundup for one reason: The use of the word sneezers, which Godin uses to refer to the customers and brand evangelizers who are best at spreading your company’s word.
  • Bing It On:
    Google is still going strong, but Bing’s share of the search market continues to grow.
  • How SEO and Sex Are the Same:
    In a post with gratuitous use of the word ‘sex,’  Joel Leydon’s parody highlighting the similarities between sex and SEO is an entertaining read. Both sex and SEO are basic needs, they’re both organic, and yes, as Leydon points out, you can also pay for each, too.

Rocking on YOUmoz

Top YOUmoz entries:

  1. Case Study: How Building a Site for Users Improved Rankings by csaliba

  2. Web Analytics and Segmentation for Better Conversion by philou2803

Do you like this post? Yes No

Posted by Sam Niccolls

 

Five Thumbs

  • Eric Schmidt – What the Internet Will Look Like in 5 Years:
    Google’s CEO takes a look into the future and talks about some of the ways the internet will change, such as Chinese language sites outnumbering English language sites, an increase in the number of digital natives in the tech workforce, and the difficulties search engines have around ranking real-time search.
  • Retailers Going Too Far Tracking Web Habits:
    I’m probably the only person on earth who puts items into his shopping cart and intentionally abandons sites in order to get product discount e-mails a week or two later, but the USA TODAY discusses two issues that are hot button topics for more normal consumers: Cookie usage and behavioral targeting.
  • Grammatically Incorrect Keywords:
    In her Search Engine Journal Post, Susanna Speier talks about how even though grammatically incorrect keywords aren’t going to win you any spelling bees, they might be the ones that’ll make you the most honey, er-um money.

Four Thumbs

  • Halloween E-mails:
    Campaign Monitor’s Halloween E-mail Roundup shows some creative, brand specific examples of Halloween e-mails that’ll give you some last minute idea fodder for this year or things to think about for next year.     
  • Update on Google Rich Snippets:
    Google has been working on better using structured data and expanding rich snippets for a while, but this week’s post on the GWC blog calls attention to improved documentation and tips around their rich snippet testing tool.
  • WSJ – Why E-mail No Longer Rules:
    You may have caught the Wall Street Journal post earlier this month, but if you didn’t, it’s worth a read. The negative backlash across the e-mail industry continues several weeks later.

Three Thumbs  

  • Integrating E-mail with Other Marketing:
    A well executed e-mail is no different from a fine wine… it’s good on it’s own, but it’s better when given the right pairing. In a useful post centered around e-mail marketing, Joel Book addresses how the most successful e-mail initiatives integrate with other marketing efforts.
  • Google Analytics Qualification Test:
    GA has had a more heavyweight certification for agencies for some time, but now available to individual marketers is a test that gives web analytics users personal certifications.
  • Creating a Multi-Cultural Website:
    If you’ve ever tried to market a product internationally, Forrester’s post about the importance of market research when creating a multi-cultural website might strike a nerve. 
  • Google Website Optimizer API Released:
    GWO rolled out a new API, which, depending on your CMS provider, can allow you to create and launch tests without touching any of your website’s code. Pretty useful stuff. Although a major limitation is that the API currently only integrates with two CMS providers.

Two Thumbs

  • Seth Godin – Some People Are Better Than Others:
    The short post about customer types earns a spot in this weeks roundup for one reason: The use of the word sneezers, which Godin uses to refer to the customers and brand evangelizers who are best at spreading your company’s word.
  • Bing It On:
    Google is still going strong, but Bing’s share of the search market continues to grow.
  • How SEO and Sex Are the Same:
    In a post with gratuitous use of the word ‘sex,’  Joel Leydon’s parody highlighting the similarities between sex and SEO is an entertaining read. Both sex and SEO are basic needs, they’re both organic, and yes, as Leydon points out, you can also pay for each, too.

Rocking on YOUmoz

Top YOUmoz entries:

  1. Case Study: How Building a Site for Users Improved Rankings by csaliba

  2. Web Analytics and Segmentation for Better Conversion by philou2803

Do you like this post? Yes No

Seth Godin: Sliced Bread

Malcolm Gladwell: Outliers

Anthony Parinello: Your Price is Too High