Yahoo Search Advertisers Rejoice Over New Network Distribution Feature

Ever since Yahoo launched their new search marketing platform in 2006, advertisers wanted more control of where their ads were showing.

Yesterday, Yahoo launched a feature named Network Distribution that gives advertisers that control. I wrote up a detailed analysis of the new feature about a week ago at Search Engine Land. Here is a copy of that:

The network distribution settings can be found in a couple places, such as under campaign settings. When you go to those settings, you will see the “Network Distribution” settings above the targeting settings. When you click on that it breaks out the options by content and search networks, in addition to breaking it out by the entire network versus Yahoo Search or Yahoo Partners only. It will also show you the past 30 days of campaign activity based on those sections, to see how many clicks, impressions and costs were associated to those areas. From that screen you can adjust your bid, plus or minus, a specific percentage for each area.

Here is a video from the YSM Blog explaining it a bit more visually:

Threads at DigitalPoint Forums & WebmasterWorld seem to be very happy with this addition. One person said:

This really makes my day.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums & WebmasterWorld.


Ever since Yahoo launched their new search marketing platform in 2006, advertisers wanted more control of where their ads were showing.

Yesterday, Yahoo launched a feature named Network Distribution that gives advertisers that control. I wrote up a detailed analysis of the new feature about a week ago at Search Engine Land. Here is a copy of that:

The network distribution settings can be found in a couple places, such as under campaign settings. When you go to those settings, you will see the “Network Distribution” settings above the targeting settings. When you click on that it breaks out the options by content and search networks, in addition to breaking it out by the entire network versus Yahoo Search or Yahoo Partners only. It will also show you the past 30 days of campaign activity based on those sections, to see how many clicks, impressions and costs were associated to those areas. From that screen you can adjust your bid, plus or minus, a specific percentage for each area.

Here is a video from the YSM Blog explaining it a bit more visually:

Threads at DigitalPoint Forums & WebmasterWorld seem to be very happy with this addition. One person said:

This really makes my day.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums & WebmasterWorld.



Google AdWords Click Through Rates: 2% is Average But Double Digits is Great

I don’t believe you often see Google AdWords representatives talking about click-through rates. But in a Google AdWords Help thread, I spotted AdWordsPro, an official Google representative, taling about averages.

In short, he said that a good average to aim for in an ads click through rate (CTR) would be 2%. But he/she has seen CTRs in the double digits for campaigns that are constantly tuned and tweaked by advertisers. Let me quote AdWordsPro:

On the other hand, to give you a point of reference to shoot for, an average CTR is probably in the neighborhood of 2% – meaning that for every 100 impressions, you would have received 2 clicks. I personally don’t think that a CTR statistic is particularly meaningful or even valid until about 1000 impressions have been received, however.

Advertisers who have really taken the time to learn how AdWords works, and who spend lots of time managing their account and tuning things up often ‘earn’ a CTR in the double digits.

Then, once you become a little more comfortable with AdWords, then it is time to stop focusing mostly on CTR, and instead focus on ROI or your Return On Investment.

I have heard of incredibly high CTRs, especially for Google ads with thongs in them. But outside of that, you know what to generally aim for.

Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.


I don’t believe you often see Google AdWords representatives talking about click-through rates. But in a Google AdWords Help thread, I spotted AdWordsPro, an official Google representative, taling about averages.

In short, he said that a good average to aim for in an ads click through rate (CTR) would be 2%. But he/she has seen CTRs in the double digits for campaigns that are constantly tuned and tweaked by advertisers. Let me quote AdWordsPro:

On the other hand, to give you a point of reference to shoot for, an average CTR is probably in the neighborhood of 2% – meaning that for every 100 impressions, you would have received 2 clicks. I personally don’t think that a CTR statistic is particularly meaningful or even valid until about 1000 impressions have been received, however.

Advertisers who have really taken the time to learn how AdWords works, and who spend lots of time managing their account and tuning things up often ‘earn’ a CTR in the double digits.

Then, once you become a little more comfortable with AdWords, then it is time to stop focusing mostly on CTR, and instead focus on ROI or your Return On Investment.

I have heard of incredibly high CTRs, especially for Google ads with thongs in them. But outside of that, you know what to generally aim for.

Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.



Google Mixed Up Link Units Earnings With Ad Units

Google sent an email to many publishers yesterday, including myself, explaining a reporting issue with Google mixing up some of the earnings for link units with regular ad units. The email’s subject line read, “Update to AdSense link unit reporting” and the email read:

As a publisher using link units on your pages, we’re writing to let you know about a recently resolved reporting issue that affected your account.

We discovered an issue with the way earnings from link units were being shown in publisher accounts, which resulted in some of your ad unit earnings being incorrectly attributed to link units instead. However, this was only a reporting display issue and so your overall earnings and payments were not affected. We’ve resolved the issue, and as a result, you may now notice slight differences when you look at reports for previous months. Specifically, when you generate separate reports for link units and ad units, you may see that earnings from link units on a particular day have decreased, but that the ad unit earnings for the same day have increased by the same amount.

Again, please be assured that your aggregate earnings and payments were unaffected, so you’ve been credited for all valid clicks and impressions. In addition, this issue has not affected your ad performance in any way.

Your reports will now accurately reflect your earnings from link units and ad units — we apologize for the inconvenience and any confusion caused.

So no damage was done on the earnings side. Some publishers who may have looked closely at their reports to make tweaks to their pages may be suffering a bit, but overall, this doesn’t seem like a major deal.

AdSenseAdvisor in a WebmasterWorld thread added a bit to it:

Just to clarify, there was a link units reporting discrepancy that we recently cleared up. Aggregate earnings were not affected AT ALL. It’s just that if you go back and pull reports on your historical performance, you may notice that a lower percentage of your earnings are now attributed to link units (and a larger percentage are attributed to regular ad units).

An email went out to all those who were affected, so I’m guessing a lot of you got it.

Your aggregate earnings have been correct all along, we were just a bit off in attributing them to link units vs. regular ad units. Now we’ve cleared it up and any reports you run now will correctly reflect exactly where your earnings came from.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums.


Google sent an email to many publishers yesterday, including myself, explaining a reporting issue with Google mixing up some of the earnings for link units with regular ad units. The email’s subject line read, “Update to AdSense link unit reporting” and the email read:

As a publisher using link units on your pages, we’re writing to let you know about a recently resolved reporting issue that affected your account.

We discovered an issue with the way earnings from link units were being shown in publisher accounts, which resulted in some of your ad unit earnings being incorrectly attributed to link units instead. However, this was only a reporting display issue and so your overall earnings and payments were not affected. We’ve resolved the issue, and as a result, you may now notice slight differences when you look at reports for previous months. Specifically, when you generate separate reports for link units and ad units, you may see that earnings from link units on a particular day have decreased, but that the ad unit earnings for the same day have increased by the same amount.

Again, please be assured that your aggregate earnings and payments were unaffected, so you’ve been credited for all valid clicks and impressions. In addition, this issue has not affected your ad performance in any way.

Your reports will now accurately reflect your earnings from link units and ad units — we apologize for the inconvenience and any confusion caused.

So no damage was done on the earnings side. Some publishers who may have looked closely at their reports to make tweaks to their pages may be suffering a bit, but overall, this doesn’t seem like a major deal.

AdSenseAdvisor in a WebmasterWorld thread added a bit to it:

Just to clarify, there was a link units reporting discrepancy that we recently cleared up. Aggregate earnings were not affected AT ALL. It’s just that if you go back and pull reports on your historical performance, you may notice that a lower percentage of your earnings are now attributed to link units (and a larger percentage are attributed to regular ad units).

An email went out to all those who were affected, so I’m guessing a lot of you got it.

Your aggregate earnings have been correct all along, we were just a bit off in attributing them to link units vs. regular ad units. Now we’ve cleared it up and any reports you run now will correctly reflect exactly where your earnings came from.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums.



Microsoft adCenter Advertiser Suffer from Quality Score Issues Also

There is a small thread at WebmasterWorld with two advertisers complaining that their US based ads are not running as often as their UK based Microsoft adCenter campaigns. In short, the US campaigns they were running, in comparison to the UK campaigns, were getting a tiny fraction of impressions and clicks.

One advertiser emailed Microsoft and received this interesting response:

We see that your program was opened in 2006.

We see that you are receiving some impressions but not nearly as many as you could be. Sometimes when a campaign or ad group is not getting very much activity for a long period of time the ad will start showing less and less because it is not performing. That may be what has happened with your campaign.

My suggestion is to start two brand new campaigns and copy all of the data over from your existing campaigns.

We know adCenter has hit campaigns for low quality ranking factors in the past, but to have two campaigns, exactly the same, with the difference being UK versus US, that seems interesting. What I find even more interesting is that Microsoft here is suggesting the advertiser build a brand new campaign and just copy over the data.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


There is a small thread at WebmasterWorld with two advertisers complaining that their US based ads are not running as often as their UK based Microsoft adCenter campaigns. In short, the US campaigns they were running, in comparison to the UK campaigns, were getting a tiny fraction of impressions and clicks.

One advertiser emailed Microsoft and received this interesting response:

We see that your program was opened in 2006.

We see that you are receiving some impressions but not nearly as many as you could be. Sometimes when a campaign or ad group is not getting very much activity for a long period of time the ad will start showing less and less because it is not performing. That may be what has happened with your campaign.

My suggestion is to start two brand new campaigns and copy all of the data over from your existing campaigns.

We know adCenter has hit campaigns for low quality ranking factors in the past, but to have two campaigns, exactly the same, with the difference being UK versus US, that seems interesting. What I find even more interesting is that Microsoft here is suggesting the advertiser build a brand new campaign and just copy over the data.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.



Some Keywords in AdWords Ads Diagnostic Tool Require Content Network?

The Google AdWords Help thread has an advertising asking why the Ads Diagnostic tool within the AdWords console is giving off this message:

To test this keyword, your campaign must be opted in to the search network.

AdWordsPro Sarah, from the Google AdWords team had an interesting response. Let me quote the whole response:

I think you are getting this messaging because some of our Tools only work for keywords that are targeted to the Search Network. From what you are describing, it sounds like you moused over the Ads Diagnostic Tool (one of our Tools that only can pull signals for ads on Search) and so you got a message basically saying, the Ads Diagnostic Tool won’t work for your keywords. This is not to say that your ads are not working, it just means the tool can not tell you if your ads are working.

To determine if your ads are running, all you need to do is check your ‘Content Network total’ row on your ad group page. If you are accruing impressions- good news, your ad is up and running. If not, you can post again here with a few more details on the type of ad you are running and the targeting you are using and people here may be able to help you sort things out.

I still don’t understand why you would need to turn on the content network to see this data on the keyword level. Maybe I am misunderstanding the issue here. Maybe this advertiser is trying to look for the content network stats on a keyword and doesn’t know it?

Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.


The Google AdWords Help thread has an advertising asking why the Ads Diagnostic tool within the AdWords console is giving off this message:

To test this keyword, your campaign must be opted in to the search network.

AdWordsPro Sarah, from the Google AdWords team had an interesting response. Let me quote the whole response:

I think you are getting this messaging because some of our Tools only work for keywords that are targeted to the Search Network. From what you are describing, it sounds like you moused over the Ads Diagnostic Tool (one of our Tools that only can pull signals for ads on Search) and so you got a message basically saying, the Ads Diagnostic Tool won’t work for your keywords. This is not to say that your ads are not working, it just means the tool can not tell you if your ads are working.

To determine if your ads are running, all you need to do is check your ‘Content Network total’ row on your ad group page. If you are accruing impressions- good news, your ad is up and running. If not, you can post again here with a few more details on the type of ad you are running and the targeting you are using and people here may be able to help you sort things out.

I still don’t understand why you would need to turn on the content network to see this data on the keyword level. Maybe I am misunderstanding the issue here. Maybe this advertiser is trying to look for the content network stats on a keyword and doesn’t know it?

Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help.



Got Multiple Listings in Google’s Local Business Center? Don’t Delete Any

I spotted this old thread at Google Maps Help that has very useful information and yet, we have not covered it (go figure). In short, the thread goes through the possibility of having a single business listed in your Google Local Business Center console multiple times. The questions are:

(1) Do you delete the repetitive listings?
(2) If so, which ones?
(3) If not, do you make sure they are in sync with each other?

For example, I have duplicate listings, two unverified, which I am afraid to delete:

google local business listings dup

Back in March, Joel H. from the Google Maps team wrote:

The only time you want to remove the listing from Maps is when the business is permanently closed OR you never want it to appear on Maps. If there are duplicates in your account, keep them. When I initially posted, I didn’t think about the ongoing process we have to merge duplicate listings on Maps. Because we do our best to merge duplicate listings on Maps, it’s possible that selecting Remove this listing from Google Maps may actually suppress a preferred listing in the future (the process of conflating listing happens regularly). We’ll keep our eye out for duplicate, Local Business Center verified listings, and work to refine our systems to merge the right listings as soon as we can. Until then, keep the conversation going on this topic, and we’ll be happy to continue to help as best we can.

————————————————————-

In the case of differing statistics (impressions/views), they are distinct listing on Maps, and Remove this listing from Google Maps is the right option. It’s likely you’ll want to choose the listing with less impressions or views.

Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.

Update: You also 100% want to check out Mike B’s post on this.

Update 2: See Joel’s comment (he works at Google):

There’s a bit of confusion here – the ‘Delete’ link has two options:

- Remove this listing from Google Maps
- Remove this listing from my Local Business Center account

The first option should be avoided, per the warning you quoted. The second option won’t cause a listings to be removed from Maps.

The second option won’t cause a business to be removed from Maps entirely — it will just delete it from your account. That’s the option you should use to get rid of extra copies of your business in your Local Business Center account.

So, if you ever have more than one listing for the same business in your account, choose one to keep, and go ahead and select: ‘Delete’ > ‘Remove this listing from my Local Business Center account’ for the others. In this case, keep your verified listing and delete the others.


I spotted this old thread at Google Maps Help that has very useful information and yet, we have not covered it (go figure). In short, the thread goes through the possibility of having a single business listed in your Google Local Business Center console multiple times. The questions are:

(1) Do you delete the repetitive listings?
(2) If so, which ones?
(3) If not, do you make sure they are in sync with each other?

For example, I have duplicate listings, two unverified, which I am afraid to delete:

google local business listings dup

Back in March, Joel H. from the Google Maps team wrote:

The only time you want to remove the listing from Maps is when the business is permanently closed OR you never want it to appear on Maps. If there are duplicates in your account, keep them. When I initially posted, I didn’t think about the ongoing process we have to merge duplicate listings on Maps. Because we do our best to merge duplicate listings on Maps, it’s possible that selecting Remove this listing from Google Maps may actually suppress a preferred listing in the future (the process of conflating listing happens regularly). We’ll keep our eye out for duplicate, Local Business Center verified listings, and work to refine our systems to merge the right listings as soon as we can. Until then, keep the conversation going on this topic, and we’ll be happy to continue to help as best we can.

————————————————————-

In the case of differing statistics (impressions/views), they are distinct listing on Maps, and Remove this listing from Google Maps is the right option. It’s likely you’ll want to choose the listing with less impressions or views.

Forum discussion at Google Maps Help.

Update: You also 100% want to check out Mike B’s post on this.

Update 2: See Joel’s comment (he works at Google):

There’s a bit of confusion here – the ‘Delete’ link has two options:

- Remove this listing from Google Maps
- Remove this listing from my Local Business Center account

The first option should be avoided, per the warning you quoted. The second option won’t cause a listings to be removed from Maps.

The second option won’t cause a business to be removed from Maps entirely — it will just delete it from your account. That’s the option you should use to get rid of extra copies of your business in your Local Business Center account.

So, if you ever have more than one listing for the same business in your account, choose one to keep, and go ahead and select: ‘Delete’ > ‘Remove this listing from my Local Business Center account’ for the others. In this case, keep your verified listing and delete the others.



Google Warns, Don’t Block AdSense Certified Ad Network

Last week, we reported that AdSense publishers are blocking the certified ad network partners and vendors for showing up on their ads because they think it is resulting in a lower earnings mark for them. I currently have a poll on that post, asking AdSense publishers if they are noticing a lower CTR and earnings from the 3rd party certified ad network. If you haven’t, please take a few seconds to take the poll.

That post came from a WebmasterWorld thread, which now has Google AdSenseAdvisor coming in warning that publishers should not block this 3rd party network. Why? Simply because it has barely been rolled out yet. AdSenseAdvisor said:

Guys, this is not a good idea. I can’t share the exact numbers, but I would be shocked if a single one of you were seeing any impressions whatsoever from Google certified ad networks yet. We’re rolling this out slowly. Very slowly.

I know it’s tempting to start fiddling with things when you see any variations in your earnings, but I’m telling you it’s not a good idea to start opting out of things that are barely launched, especially given the potential for real upside in the longer term.

Wow, some really strong words from AdSenseAdvisor, something I would take note of, if you have or are considering blocking the certified 3rd party ad network.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


Last week, we reported that AdSense publishers are blocking the certified ad network partners and vendors for showing up on their ads because they think it is resulting in a lower earnings mark for them. I currently have a poll on that post, asking AdSense publishers if they are noticing a lower CTR and earnings from the 3rd party certified ad network. If you haven’t, please take a few seconds to take the poll.

That post came from a WebmasterWorld thread, which now has Google AdSenseAdvisor coming in warning that publishers should not block this 3rd party network. Why? Simply because it has barely been rolled out yet. AdSenseAdvisor said:

Guys, this is not a good idea. I can’t share the exact numbers, but I would be shocked if a single one of you were seeing any impressions whatsoever from Google certified ad networks yet. We’re rolling this out slowly. Very slowly.

I know it’s tempting to start fiddling with things when you see any variations in your earnings, but I’m telling you it’s not a good idea to start opting out of things that are barely launched, especially given the potential for real upside in the longer term.

Wow, some really strong words from AdSenseAdvisor, something I would take note of, if you have or are considering blocking the certified 3rd party ad network.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.



Seth Godin: Sliced Bread

Malcolm Gladwell: Outliers

Anthony Parinello: Your Price is Too High