Free Webinar: Getting to Know Open Site Explorer

Posted by great scott!

Last week we unveiled our newest toy, Open Site Explorer, to the world and the response was phenomenal. Now we want to take some time and really show everyone just what this powerful link analysis tool is capable of and answer your questions, so we’re hosting not one, but two FREE Webinars this week (it’s the same content, run twice to help accomodate schedules and time zones).

The presentations will be 60 minutes each, 25 minutes of slides, followed by 35 minutes of Q+A on Wednesday, January 27th at 2:00PM (PST), and Thursday, January 28th at 10:00AM (PST)  In each live webinar, Rand will show you around Open Site Explorer, offer tips and strategies for getting the most out of it, explain our new Domain Authority & Page Authority metrics, and answer your questions.

Here’s the catch: each webinar is limited to 1,000 attendees. The last time we announced a webinar on the blog, we had over 3,000 people try to register in the first hour, so if you want to attend one of the live sessions, register quickly. If you can’t make it, we’ll have a recording of the presentation available in a couple of days on our webinars page.



Looooove Webinars and can’t get enough of ‘em? Then you should totally become a PRO Member! In the last couple of months we’ve started running regular webinars just for PRO Members and they’ve been really popular.

PRO Webinar Link Building Strategies
A slide from our December PRO Webinar on Link Building Strategies

PRO Webinar SEO Strategies for 2010
A slide from our January PRO Webinar on SEO Strategies for 2010

In February we’re stepping it up even more. In addition to our monthly educational webinar (February 4th on Analytics), we’re adding a second monthly webinar where we’ll be performing live site reviews of sites submitted by our PRO Members!

PRO Members can head over to the PRO Webinars page for more info on February’s webinars, as well as recordings and slide decks from past webinars. If you’d like to join us for the next PRO Webinar–and possibly even get a live site review–sign up for PRO to access the PRO Webinar page for registration details or just watch your inbox for an invite.

Do you like this post? Yes No

Posted by great scott!

Last week we unveiled our newest toy, Open Site Explorer, to the world and the response was phenomenal. Now we want to take some time and really show everyone just what this powerful link analysis tool is capable of and answer your questions, so we’re hosting not one, but two FREE Webinars this week (it’s the same content, run twice to help accomodate schedules and time zones).

The presentations will be 60 minutes each, 25 minutes of slides, followed by 35 minutes of Q+A on Wednesday, January 27th at 2:00PM (PST), and Thursday, January 28th at 10:00AM (PST)  In each live webinar, Rand will show you around Open Site Explorer, offer tips and strategies for getting the most out of it, explain our new Domain Authority & Page Authority metrics, and answer your questions.

Here’s the catch: each webinar is limited to 1,000 attendees. The last time we announced a webinar on the blog, we had over 3,000 people try to register in the first hour, so if you want to attend one of the live sessions, register quickly. If you can’t make it, we’ll have a recording of the presentation available in a couple of days on our webinars page.



Looooove Webinars and can’t get enough of ‘em? Then you should totally become a PRO Member! In the last couple of months we’ve started running regular webinars just for PRO Members and they’ve been really popular.

PRO Webinar Link Building Strategies
A slide from our December PRO Webinar on Link Building Strategies

PRO Webinar SEO Strategies for 2010
A slide from our January PRO Webinar on SEO Strategies for 2010

In February we’re stepping it up even more. In addition to our monthly educational webinar (February 4th on Analytics), we’re adding a second monthly webinar where we’ll be performing live site reviews of sites submitted by our PRO Members!

PRO Members can head over to the PRO Webinars page for more info on February’s webinars, as well as recordings and slide decks from past webinars. If you’d like to join us for the next PRO Webinar–and possibly even get a live site review–sign up for PRO to access the PRO Webinar page for registration details or just watch your inbox for an invite.

Do you like this post? Yes No

Should Google Add “Last Updated” Note to All Search Results?

For new content, Google often adds to the search result a little note of some sort that says how new the content is. Normally in the form of X minutes ago or X hours ago. I have some screen shots of how this works over here. But should Google always do this? Should Google show the date the last time that page was updated in the search results even if it means X years ago?

A Google Web Search Help thread is having discussion just about that feature request. Of course it can come in handy, to know which pages are more up-to-date than others, especially for product reviews and news related content. Google somewhat handles this for articles that contain the dates in them, here is an example:

Google Last Update in SERPs

Notice the dates in the snippets. But again, this is just the date of the article, not the last time the article was updated.

Do you think Google should be sharing this information in the search results?

Should Google Show “Last Updated” Info for ALL Search Results?(polls)

Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.


For new content, Google often adds to the search result a little note of some sort that says how new the content is. Normally in the form of X minutes ago or X hours ago. I have some screen shots of how this works over here. But should Google always do this? Should Google show the date the last time that page was updated in the search results even if it means X years ago?

A Google Web Search Help thread is having discussion just about that feature request. Of course it can come in handy, to know which pages are more up-to-date than others, especially for product reviews and news related content. Google somewhat handles this for articles that contain the dates in them, here is an example:

Google Last Update in SERPs

Notice the dates in the snippets. But again, this is just the date of the article, not the last time the article was updated.

Do you think Google should be sharing this information in the search results?

Forum discussion at Google Web Search Help.



Webmasters Wary of Google Public DNS

Google announced the launch of the Google Public DNS service, which is a free public domain name system. It is a lot like OpenDNS, but without any of the administrative controls for blocking sites or redirecting mismatched domains to a special landing page (which is where OpenDNS makes their money).

Google’s DNS IPs are pretty sweet, they are 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. If you want to use it, here are the configuration instructions.

Google said they are doing this for one reason and one reason alone. To make the web faster. Google knows which sites are the most popular out there and they will precache those pages so it doesn’t have to be done at the time of the DNS request. Most DNS servers cache sites based on the last time a user of theirs accessed it, Google will anticipate that without usage – at this point. Google likes speed, as we discussed time and time again over here.

Google is convinced you will like their DNS server because it will speed things up, make things more secure and they won’t do any type of redirection at all.

You think Google will use the data to track you? Well, Google very specifically detailed what they will be tracking and for how long. The “temporary logs” contain IP level information, but Google will destroy “temporary logs within 24 to 48 hours.” However, Google will be storing specific information on an aggregate level, those details can be found here.

As I said, webmasters are wary and there is a long WebmasterWorld thread with comments:

With it being such an easy way to track who goes where, I’m surprised Google is just getting into this now.

Would this really benefit anyone besides Google?

Reading their gumph, they claim that having a large, common caching database will mean faster performance for all, but is it really worth the slight boost in performance in exchange for giving Google even more of your data?

Google claim that their service will attempt to send users to their geographically closest data centre.

But I still reckon it’s wisest to just stick with your own ISP’s DNS offering, unless you know what you’re doing.

Personally, I use OpenDNS because of the security and the ability to block access to specific sites on the DNS level – which is nice. Would I switch? Who knows. But I do like how the OpenDNS blog responded to this Google news, “to think that Google’s DNS service is for the benefit of the Internet would be naive.” Now that is classic!

Forum discussion WebmasterWorld.


Google announced the launch of the Google Public DNS service, which is a free public domain name system. It is a lot like OpenDNS, but without any of the administrative controls for blocking sites or redirecting mismatched domains to a special landing page (which is where OpenDNS makes their money).

Google’s DNS IPs are pretty sweet, they are 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. If you want to use it, here are the configuration instructions.

Google said they are doing this for one reason and one reason alone. To make the web faster. Google knows which sites are the most popular out there and they will precache those pages so it doesn’t have to be done at the time of the DNS request. Most DNS servers cache sites based on the last time a user of theirs accessed it, Google will anticipate that without usage – at this point. Google likes speed, as we discussed time and time again over here.

Google is convinced you will like their DNS server because it will speed things up, make things more secure and they won’t do any type of redirection at all.

You think Google will use the data to track you? Well, Google very specifically detailed what they will be tracking and for how long. The “temporary logs” contain IP level information, but Google will destroy “temporary logs within 24 to 48 hours.” However, Google will be storing specific information on an aggregate level, those details can be found here.

As I said, webmasters are wary and there is a long WebmasterWorld thread with comments:

With it being such an easy way to track who goes where, I’m surprised Google is just getting into this now.

Would this really benefit anyone besides Google?

Reading their gumph, they claim that having a large, common caching database will mean faster performance for all, but is it really worth the slight boost in performance in exchange for giving Google even more of your data?

Google claim that their service will attempt to send users to their geographically closest data centre.

But I still reckon it’s wisest to just stick with your own ISP’s DNS offering, unless you know what you’re doing.

Personally, I use OpenDNS because of the security and the ability to block access to specific sites on the DNS level – which is nice. Would I switch? Who knows. But I do like how the OpenDNS blog responded to this Google news, “to think that Google’s DNS service is for the benefit of the Internet would be naive.” Now that is classic!

Forum discussion WebmasterWorld.



Maybe a Minor Google Search Update (October 2009)?

Over the past day or so, I have been seeing and watching a small increase in the number of threads discussing either global changes to the Google index or people complaining (at a higher rate) that their site is no longer ranking as well in Google.

Yes, Google is constantly changing, so this may just be that people are around more to notice? But the shift in the forum patterns that I watch on this specific topic is trending towards a possible Google update that is larger than a normal Google daily flux.

We have threads on the topic at DigitalPoint Forums (actually a few there, as always), an ongoing WebmasterWorld thread with new activity and dozens of threads at Google Webmaster Help.

Again, this may be nothing or it may be early signs of an update coming. There have also been complaints both in the Google Webmaster Help forums and at WebmasterWorld of connectivity issues with Google.

The last time we reported on an update was in August where Matt Cutts of Google told us there was nothing going on.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums, WebmasterWorld and Google Webmaster Help.


Over the past day or so, I have been seeing and watching a small increase in the number of threads discussing either global changes to the Google index or people complaining (at a higher rate) that their site is no longer ranking as well in Google.

Yes, Google is constantly changing, so this may just be that people are around more to notice? But the shift in the forum patterns that I watch on this specific topic is trending towards a possible Google update that is larger than a normal Google daily flux.

We have threads on the topic at DigitalPoint Forums (actually a few there, as always), an ongoing WebmasterWorld thread with new activity and dozens of threads at Google Webmaster Help.

Again, this may be nothing or it may be early signs of an update coming. There have also been complaints both in the Google Webmaster Help forums and at WebmasterWorld of connectivity issues with Google.

The last time we reported on an update was in August where Matt Cutts of Google told us there was nothing going on.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums, WebmasterWorld and Google Webmaster Help.



Seth Godin: Sliced Bread

Malcolm Gladwell: Outliers

Anthony Parinello: Your Price is Too High

©