A Conversational Analysis of SxSW

Thank you Amita Paul, CEO of Objective Marketer for providing this fantastic analysis of SxSW and the conversational activity around the event.
The report provided influencer and demographic data and provides insights as to how information is shared during events.  Some of the key findings include:

Higher followership did not guarantee higher retweets but higher rewteets did require a higher number of followers
Most active users were with tweets in the range of 1,000 to 100,000.  Activity level of the users with fewer tweets was high. So, It is not necessary that people who are heavy twitter users will be the most active
Embedding multi-media content may not be as effective a strategy on Twitter as it is on Facebook. The retweets for messages without images (31.6%) was almost double than the retweets received for messages with images (16.8%)
The number of Retweets is significantly more when the follower /friend ratio [...]

twitter

Thank you Amita Paul, CEO of Objective Marketer for providing this fantastic analysis of SxSW and the conversational activity around the event.

The report provided influencer and demographic data and provides insights as to how information is shared during events.  Some of the key findings include:

  • Higher followership did not guarantee higher retweets but higher rewteets did require a higher number of followers
  • Most active users were with tweets in the range of 1,000 to 100,000.  Activity level of the users with fewer tweets was high. So, It is not necessary that people who are heavy twitter users will be the most active
  • Embedding multi-media content may not be as effective a strategy on Twitter as it is on Facebook. The retweets for messages without images (31.6%) was almost double than the retweets received for messages with images (16.8%)
  • The number of Retweets is significantly more when the follower /friend ratio > =1.
  • Tweets and Retweets can have different activity peaks.  Retweets followed Tweets for about 30 minutes to 1 hour.

Are you a Marketing SEO or a Technical SEO?

There are many different ways to achieve good quality search engine optimization results online. When SEO was first introduced about ten years ago the approach was a very technical one. It came down to things looking like a science project rather than true marketing. Over the years there has been a slow transition. The search [...]

There are many different ways to achieve good quality search engine optimization results online. When SEO was first introduced about ten years ago the approach was a very technical one. It came down to things looking like a science project rather than true marketing. Over the years there has been a slow transition. The search engines where never supposed to be manipulated by a mathematical approach in order to get things to rank well. As the transition occurs it will be important to figure out what type of SEO you are. Do you like to market a business and build it through a variety of online marketing approaches or do you like to take a much more technical approach with your links?

Whichever approach you chose it is important to realize that the search engines are constantly evolving and moving away from a technical approach. As they grow their focus on offering the cleanest and most relevant information this will only become stronger. The search engines are already showing signs of rewarding those who market a business with the means of growing a business through a variety of quality online marketing and branding efforts rather than just putting a number value on how many links one can achieve. A technical approach is what the search engines are really trying to move away from. If you are an online marketer the search engines want to see you build rankings from building your brand online not through finding loop holes. Things like online PR announcing newsworthy topics and positioning yourself as an industry expert through proactive article marketing. Things a real business would do to market themselves if the internet never existed. Search engines want to see a heavy focus on social media marketing as well. Social media marketing takes time with a quality approach so no fly by night who wants to generate a specific number of links is going to take their time to actually communicate with their audience online through a series of conversations. The technical SEO approach has a shelf life that will soon expire. Those ridiculous promises of thousand of directories or “article blasters” will soon be a thing of the past.

Push Or Pull, Are You Marketing Properly?

Traditional marketing has often been called “push” marketing, but there is another kind of marketing that has taken root and been expanded upon within the last 15 years, getting its big debut with the advent of the Internet. It’s called “pull” marketing. Also known as in bound marketing in some places recently as well.
So [...]

Traditional marketing has often been called “push” marketing, but there is another kind of marketing that has taken root and been expanded upon within the last 15 years, getting its big debut with the advent of the Internet. It’s called “pull” marketing. Also known as in bound marketing in some places recently as well.

So what’s the difference? Push marketing is marketing that you push out to an audience, delivering your message to an unsuspecting audience who wasn’t really looking for it. Examples would be TV and radio advertising. Pull marketing is just the opposite. With pull marketing, you attract an audience to you who is actively looking or in the market for what you have to offer.

Pull marketing has been made possible by search engine optimization and search engine marketing. When a searcher goes online to find information about a particular topic, your goal as marketer is to position your offer so that the searcher can find it easily. That’s what search engine marketing and optimization is all about. It’s also what pay per click advertising, e-mail marketing, and social media marketing are all about. The marketers are “pulling” their audiences in; that is, the successful ones are. Many of the unsuccessful marketers are still trying to push.

Another term that push marketing is also referred to is interruption marketing, this has always been a standard for traditional marketers. Mediums such as radio, TV, billboard or print advertising often push or interrupt their audience. This type of branding is useful but often does not generate the type of return on investment or ROI that a pull campaign might.

Are you pushing or pulling? Have you tested both strategies side by side? Which one produced better results? I am not that biased or anything :)

The Most Essential SEO Data To Measure

If you are doing your own search engine optimization or even you have have hired an SEO firm, then you’ll want to make sure that you measure certain data to determine whether or not your SEO efforts are paying off. There are all sorts of data that you can measure, but I’ve narrowed down the [...]

If you are doing your own search engine optimization or even you have have hired an SEO firm, then you’ll want to make sure that you measure certain data to determine whether or not your SEO efforts are paying off. There are all sorts of data that you can measure, but I’ve narrowed down the list to the ones that absolutely are essential data sets for every business owner or marketer to measure.

  1. Sales, Leads aka Conversions – At the end of the day all of your online and offline marketing efforts come down to increasing and generating sales for your business. Often many times people tend to loose sight of this key aspect and how truly important it is. The only difference is that search engine optimization is a long term and on going. Have patience and measure your sales and conversion increase over time.
  2. Organic Website Visitors – Tied directly into increasing conversions, over time the key measurable area is how many visitors is your website receiving as a result of your SEO efforts. This means out of all of the keyword phrases that you targeted on your website how many organic (from the 3 major search engines) visitors is your website getting. A simple way to break down the return on investment for this is to add up your monthly SEO service fee or your time (if doing your SEO on your own) and divide the into the money spent. Along with sales this is a good way to gauge how well things are going. I often explain to my SEO clients that if you are spending $5 on average per click for your PPC advertising (although not directly apples to apples with SEO visitors) but if you organic visitors on average cost $.25 then things are looking pretty good!
  3. Keyword Rankings – By keyword rankings I mean the actual search engine rankings of each page on your site for each keyword that is important to that page. If you have a 10-page website and each page has a primary and a secondary keyword that it has been optimized for, that’s 20 keyword rankings you should concern yourself with. Over the past several years keyword positioning has started to diminish as a key goal (I am so glad!). With universal search, social search and the keyword rankings that fluctuate sometimes daily based on datacenter and visitor location, this is still an important measurement, but 3rd on my list.
  4. Indexed Web Pages – How many pages you have indexed at each search engine is important. If your website has 100 pages published and you have 90 pages indexed at Google, 94 pages indexed at Yahoo!, 52 at Bing, and 87 at Ask, you’ve got a red flag. That 52 pages at Bing needs to be looked at more critically. Why only 52? Why isn’t Bing indexing more pages? Keep an eye on this metric and make sure that your pages are getting indexed.
  5. Inbound Links – Finally, the number of relevant inbound links your site has, and each page has, point to it. Obviously, link building is important so make sure your links are getting counted by Google webmaster tools. Also, be sure to build your links the right ways, through highly relevant incoming links from many different sources, over time.

How To Build Links For Bing

Link building is one of the most important tasks for any webmaster or marketer that is looking for long term search engine optimization growth. Google has taught us all that. But what about Bing? Now that Microsoft has waged a third quarter blitz to gain some competitive advantage against its arch nemesis, the folks in [...]

Link building is one of the most important tasks for any webmaster or marketer that is looking for long term search engine optimization growth. Google has taught us all that. But what about Bing? Now that Microsoft has waged a third quarter blitz to gain some competitive advantage against its arch nemesis, the folks in charge of indexing websites at Bing want to make sure we all understand the best practices for building inbound links to our websites.

The good news is it’s not a far cry different than building links for Google. The bad news is it’s not a far cry different than building links for Google.

Let me explain that. First, a little snippet from the Bing blog:

Bing’s position on link building is straightforward – we are less concerned about the link building techniques used than we are about the intentions behind the effort. That said, techniques used are often quite revealing of intent.

That’s pretty much Google’s take as well. Rather than focusing on good technique versus bad technique, the search engines are more concerned with why webmasters perform certain tasks. That’s why one technique may work well for some webmasters, but get other webmasters flagged for spam. So how does Bing know whether you have good intentions or bad?

That’s the same question that many people have been asking of Google for several years now. And the answer is just as muddled as the answer for good technique/bad technique.

Again, from the Bing blog:

The webmasters who create end user value within their websites, based on the needs of people, are the ones who will see their page rank improve. So where does that value come from? Content. Good, original, text-based content.

In essence, all good link building starts with good content. That’s true for Bing and Google alike.

It’s refreshing to see Bing get serious about link building quality. That hasn’t always been the case. I think the people at Bing have spent a few years studying Google from the inside out. As a result, they’ve modeled some of their own indexing and ranking practices on Google’s policies. The result for Bing is a better search engine and more respect from the SEO community. So what about link building for Bing? What makes a good link?

Well, from their own blog, here’s the bucket list:

  • Seek links from relevant sites
  • Seek out high authority websites
  • Stay natural

The same old message we’ve heard from Google, right? Yes.

And to answer the How question, here’s what Bing says (again from the blog):

  • Develop your brand
  • Let relevant industry people with blogs and websites know of your website
  • Publish optimized online press releases
  • Do some article marketing
  • Participate in blogs and forums
  • Build relationships through social media
  • Create an online newsletter
  • Write a blog
  • Join some industry associations
  • Become a trusted expert in your niche

Sound familiar? If it does then it’s probably because you’ve been listening to what the folks at Google and the thousands of SEOs (including me) have been saying about link building for the past ten years (or five years at least).

The good news is, Bing’s list of link building best practices is the same as what we’ve all been saying for some time now. The bad news? Bing isn’t being particularly innovative here. But then, they shouldn’t be.

Google Poland: Scam Ads in Polish AdWords

This site rarely ever has guest posts, but I wanted to make an exception for a long time reader and SEO who often sends me tips and advice. Kasia Bauer, a search marketer from Poland, author of Magiczne SEO & SEM blog and co-owner of Divbi.com has written a guest post on Google AdWords scams in Poland. We hear about Google AdWords scams in the U.S. often enough, to the point where Google took action. In fact, just yesterday we reported how Google is getting stricter, but does this apply to outside the U.S.? What type of scams are occurring on Google there? So we have this guest post just on that topic.

Scam Ads in Polish AdWords

Recently, scam ads gained noticeable presence in Google AdWords across Central and Eastern Europe. Polish AdWords is currently experiencing a wave of campaigns that are preying on naive users. It has been at least 11 months since we have noticed first suspicious ads appearing on Google Network. It looks like Google is doing very little, or even nothing, to prevent them from showing.

How Do These Scams Work?

All the scams are based on premium SMS service. A user is lured to fill up a test and, in order to see it’s results, has to send a text message to number provided on the landing page. After getting the verification code the website will allow him or her to see test results with the “service”. Everything would be OK if only:

  1. The ads would appear only with searches regarding related keywords
  2. The landing pages weren’t misleading
  3. The service would provide some real value
  4. The service would not violate Google AdWords TOS

The AdWords advertising policies states:

Don’t use phishing or other scamming tactics.

Advertising is not permitted for sites collecting sensitive personal information or money with fake forms, false claims, or unauthorized use of Google Trademarks. Examples of personal information include email addresses, user names, passwords, and/or payment information. In addition, advertising is not permitted for ‘run your car on water’ programs or content.

The most popular “service” is the ”find out when will you die” test.

The ads are showing up both on search and content network. Here are screen captures:

kampania-sms-serp

nasza-klasa-leading-social-site

After clicking on one of the ads, user will find himself on a landing page, which asks to fill up a test in order to find out date of his death. It consists of about 20 ridiculous or often very personal questions.

test-question

After finishing the test, user finds out that results are not free. He or she is presented with a prompt to pay for “the date of your death”. Sometimes the end pagesshow the information to send the money via SMS only. The cost of 1 text message is stated with very small font in the footer and is about 23 PLN (~$8.34).

lp1

Some landing pages are formatted in a misleading way. The price for paying via credit card is enlarged and bolded, and so is the information “pay via SMS”. Such design suggests that the price of the SMS is the enlarged one. However, the real price is stated further below, again with small font.

lp2

Polish Google representatives in Warsaw do not comment on the situation officially with anything else than “it is a really big problem”. This is hard to believe, since majority of those ads have similarities in their ad texts which could be flagged by a simple keyword filter. It is really disappointing to see how the leading ad network is not only being polluted this way, but also artificially increases CPC for legitimate advertisers. Whole situation makes one think that having 97%+ of local search market made Google less likely to act.

You can find more on this topic in my Polish blog post: Scam Ads in Poland.

In classic Search Engine Roundtable style… Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help, Golden Line and Gazeta.pl Forum.


This site rarely ever has guest posts, but I wanted to make an exception for a long time reader and SEO who often sends me tips and advice. Kasia Bauer, a search marketer from Poland, author of Magiczne SEO & SEM blog and co-owner of Divbi.com has written a guest post on Google AdWords scams in Poland. We hear about Google AdWords scams in the U.S. often enough, to the point where Google took action. In fact, just yesterday we reported how Google is getting stricter, but does this apply to outside the U.S.? What type of scams are occurring on Google there? So we have this guest post just on that topic.

Scam Ads in Polish AdWords

Recently, scam ads gained noticeable presence in Google AdWords across Central and Eastern Europe. Polish AdWords is currently experiencing a wave of campaigns that are preying on naive users. It has been at least 11 months since we have noticed first suspicious ads appearing on Google Network. It looks like Google is doing very little, or even nothing, to prevent them from showing.

How Do These Scams Work?

All the scams are based on premium SMS service. A user is lured to fill up a test and, in order to see it’s results, has to send a text message to number provided on the landing page. After getting the verification code the website will allow him or her to see test results with the “service”. Everything would be OK if only:

  1. The ads would appear only with searches regarding related keywords
  2. The landing pages weren’t misleading
  3. The service would provide some real value
  4. The service would not violate Google AdWords TOS

The AdWords advertising policies states:

Don’t use phishing or other scamming tactics.

Advertising is not permitted for sites collecting sensitive personal information or money with fake forms, false claims, or unauthorized use of Google Trademarks. Examples of personal information include email addresses, user names, passwords, and/or payment information. In addition, advertising is not permitted for ‘run your car on water’ programs or content.

The most popular “service” is the ”find out when will you die” test.

The ads are showing up both on search and content network. Here are screen captures:

kampania-sms-serp

nasza-klasa-leading-social-site

After clicking on one of the ads, user will find himself on a landing page, which asks to fill up a test in order to find out date of his death. It consists of about 20 ridiculous or often very personal questions.

test-question

After finishing the test, user finds out that results are not free. He or she is presented with a prompt to pay for “the date of your death”. Sometimes the end pagesshow the information to send the money via SMS only. The cost of 1 text message is stated with very small font in the footer and is about 23 PLN (~$8.34).

lp1

Some landing pages are formatted in a misleading way. The price for paying via credit card is enlarged and bolded, and so is the information “pay via SMS”. Such design suggests that the price of the SMS is the enlarged one. However, the real price is stated further below, again with small font.

lp2

Polish Google representatives in Warsaw do not comment on the situation officially with anything else than “it is a really big problem”. This is hard to believe, since majority of those ads have similarities in their ad texts which could be flagged by a simple keyword filter. It is really disappointing to see how the leading ad network is not only being polluted this way, but also artificially increases CPC for legitimate advertisers. Whole situation makes one think that having 97%+ of local search market made Google less likely to act.

You can find more on this topic in my Polish blog post: Scam Ads in Poland.

In classic Search Engine Roundtable style… Forum discussion at Google AdWords Help, Golden Line and Gazeta.pl Forum.



Can Google Protect Your Privacy?

I just found a very interesting interview between Neil Cavuto at Fox Business and Google CEO Eric Schmidt. They cover a lot of ground in this interview, but one interesting thing Eric Schmidt said was that Google is going to try not to cross the creepy line. He sees his company a lot like Microsoft, [...]

I just found a very interesting interview between Neil Cavuto at Fox Business and Google CEO Eric Schmidt. They cover a lot of ground in this interview, but one interesting thing Eric Schmidt said was that Google is going to try not to cross the creepy line. He sees his company a lot like Microsoft, but he doesn’t want to make the same mistakes that Microsoft made and which landed that company in hot water with the public.

If you have some time, feel free to watch the interview with Google’s Eric Schmidt:

The topic of discussion during that segment of the interview was Google’s new Dashboard feature, an information resource for consumers that privacy advocates are a bit leery of. It does beg the question, “How much does Google know about us and how much should they know?” But there are also ramifications in other areas of our online lives.

For instance, if Google gets its hands on private sensitive information that is then shared with a marketer, that information is no longer private. The marketer could then sell the information to other marketers and then there is a huge problem. What will Google do to prevent that kind of scenario?

That’s a question Neil Cavuto and Eric Schmidt do not get into discussing, but it is a question worth asking. As a marketer, I’m all for the liberty to use information to run my business and acquire new customers, but as a consumer I’d also like to have maximum level of privacy. Where’s the balance?

In the Kingdom of Content, Relevance Rules

We’ve all heard that content is king, but what kind of kingdom are you giving your people?
The average marketer will run a totalitarianism kingdom, in which all content focuses around a particular product or company. “Shamefully self promoting” is how my SEO co-workers refer to it and nobody appreciates it, or reads it for that [...]

We’ve all heard that content is king, but what kind of kingdom are you giving your people?

If Content is King, Relevance is Queen!

If Content is King, Relevance is Queen!

The average marketer will run a totalitarianism kingdom, in which all content focuses around a particular product or company. “Shamefully self promoting” is how my SEO co-workers refer to it and nobody appreciates it, or reads it for that matter, except the marketers themselves.

Repetitively posting your shameful promotion material every 15 minutes on Facebook and Twitter is officially deemed annoying and pointless. If anything, you’re repelling potential clientele.

What you, as ruler, want to do is run a socialist kingdom, where everyone (you and your reader) gets equal benefits from your writing. If you treat all of your subjects like royalty, they will become loyal subjects, follow your blog and, eventually, start looking at what you have to sell.

How is this done?

Luckily, with informational content, you don’t have to be the village’s best writer, although it’s always helpful. But you do need to know your industry inside and out. If you’re a good businessman, then you already have this down. If not, pick a different day job?

Let’s throw out some examples. If you are a mechanic, you sell the services that you offer. But nobody is going to read a blog that shouts out the hot deals at Bert’s Terrific Transmissions on I-94.

Instead, write about all that knowledge that is floating around in your brain. Believe it or not, it is worth a lot of money. But instead, you’re going to use that power for good and give it to your readers for free.

Blog about simple car maintenance that every car owner should know.

Blog about the three worse things you can do to your car.

Blog about your favorite transmission oil and why you prefer it to others, or what happens if you don’t change your oil frequently.

If you become an information outlet, instead of a promotion machine, then people will naturally gravitate to your blog for insightful information on their car troubles. Your goal is to become their go-to man for all their mechanical problems.

When you give people free, valuable stuff (i.e. information), consumers tend to trust you. Before you know it, they will trust you for all their car-related needs.

More examples?

“We are the best and smartest SEO provider in the world,” – shameful self promotion.

4 Easy SEO Copywriting Tips for Smart Bloggers,” – useful industry information that entices readers (hopefully).

Bottom line is that everyone is an expert in their chosen area, so why not share all that juicy information with your readers, or should I say potential customers?

Jewelry designers can blog about how to spot flawed jewels. Real estate agents can blog about market trends. Restaurant owners should blog about in-season foods. And SEO providers should blog about how to rank on the first page of search results for your industry.

Hmmmm…….well, I digress.

So, the lesson to be learned is to be concerned about the well being of the people of your kingdom, instead of yourself. If you are a selfless ruler, you will soon learn that your subjects will come to respect, trust and confide in you.

In due time, they will offer up their shillings (or whatever currency you do business in) and then both you and your kingdom will live happily ever after.

The end.

Conference Recap: ExactTarget Connections ’09

Posted by great scott!

We don’t talk about email marketing on the blog much, but any of you working in the internet marketing space (and that’s likely all of you) probably know that it’s still one of the most effective marketing channels out there. 

We’ve been fortunate enough over the years to partner with ExactTarget for our email marketing services and as they’ve grown and improved their offerings they constantly make me feel terrible.  Don’t get me wrong, they’re awesome, in fact they’re too awesome. The stuff their system is capable of and the one-to-one, closed-loop strategies they evangelize are amazing and I feel terrible that I haven’t been able to implement every concept they’ve thrown my way.  Nonetheless, I’m a huge fan, so mozPal, all-around great guy, and ExactTarget VP of Marketing, Jeff Rohrs, invited me to attend Connections ’09, ET’s annual user conference in their hometown of Indianapolis last week.

Don’t run away just yet. While Connections is theoretically designed as a user conference, I went in specifically with the outlook of a platform-agnostic email marketer in order to evaluate the content and value of the conference for you, dear reader.  Yes, there was a fair amount of ExactTarget rah-rah, but bottom line: if you’re interested in email marketing, there were great lessons to be learned (and awesome parties to attend) regardless of whether you actually use ET or not. Since interesting and actionable takeaways are what we all want to get out of conferences, let me take you through a rundown of the sessions I attended, as well as some of the things that garnered large, scribbled asterisks or frantic underlines in my notes (yeah, I’m an analog kid, I take notes with a pen and paper, do I lose my membership in the club?).

DAY 1

The first day was all about keynote presentations. I have to take a second to call out the production values of this seminar. The main ballroom where all of the keynotes were held was incredible. Giant screens everywhere, slick lighting and signage, multiple cameras to re-broadcast the speakers onto screens, lighted backdrops, the whole nine. I’ve been to a good handful of conferences from the tiny to the huge, and this was by far the slickest, most smoothly run, and most impressively produced I’ve ever seen (apparently coordinated by Seattle-area event firm HB Stubbs). All other search industry shows (SEOmoz included) should strive to meet the quality and attention to detail ET puts into Connections…seriously.

Connections '09 Main Stage
The main stage at Connections ’09

Scott Dorsey, CEO & Scott McCorkle, COO ExactTarget

The ET C-suite kicked things off with a pleasant, though painfully scripted, welcome message. There were some cool feature announcements, but as I said, this is a platform agnostic event review, so I’ll spare you the details. Scott Dorsey did drop some interesting statistics that I thought were quite impressive though:

  • ET clients send 2 billion emails every month.
  • They create 1 billion new contacts and records every day.
  • ET currently manages 100 Terabytes of data for their customers (that’s 10x the Library of Congress)
  • A study they conducted with Forrester showed that only 15% of consumers want all of their marketing communication through email.
  • The same study also showed that, in general, consumers prefer email 300% over other delivery methods.

Malcolm Gladwell

Malcolm Gladwell

Talk about bringing out the big guns right away, the second speech of the entire event was sociologist and best-selling author Malcolm Gladwell, best know for his books The Tipping Point, Blink, and Outliers (Umm, did I mention everyone in attendance was given an autographed, hard-bound copy of Outliers in their swag bag? Slightly cooler than a t-shirt.).

Gladwell spoke about his findings in his latest book, Outliers, which studied the backgrounds of successful individuals, looking for patterns that determine success.  He used the band Fleetwood Mac as his example for this presentation.  Most people (myself included) think of Fleetwood Mac as a band that emerged out of nowhere in the 70′s with their eponymous "debut" album, which they soon followed with Rumors, one of the most influential and best-selling albums of all time (OF ALL TIME!).  Well, turns out we’re all wrong. Fleetwood Mac started in 1967 and released 15 largely ignored albums under a kaleidoscope of various lineups before finding success in 1975 with Fleetwood Mac.

Turns out, in Gladwell’s studies, this pattern is almost without exception. People considered successful experts in their field almost always exhibit 10,000 hours or more of study, practice, and dedication to their craft or skill-set before they reach success.

Great, Scott, but where’s that valuable takeaway you promised? 

In our world of the internet it can be all too easy to hold ourselves to impossible standards of overnight, instant success. What Gladwell’s study shows is that we greatly underestimate the amount of time and effort that goes into success. There’s little that’s truly arbitrary or mysterious about success; it has a logic, a pattern, and a consistent architecture: it requires effort, hard work, and time. We put too much emphasis on "talent" and "luck" when, in reality, they’re minor contributors.  Expecting yourself to stumble upon that figurative lottery ticket is a lot of pressure to put on yourself and brings with it huge potential for disappointment. Isn’t it more comforting to know that your success can be designed? Relax, even the Beatles spent their first several years playing as a cover band in a strip club in Hamburg, Germany…great things can come from humble beginnings, just give yourself a chance to put in the effort.

Kelly Mooney, CEO Resource Interactive

Kelly Mooney

Author and CEO of Resource Interactive, Kelly Mooney, followed Gladwell with a presentation on her concept of the "O.P.E.N. Imperitive," her model for creating an open brand that engages with users on the social web. It’s a very cool model to work from and one that I think can really help any company working to develop a social strategy. Her new book on the concept, The Open Brand, is probably worth a look. 

Kelly’s model creates a spectrum of online consumers (which she prefers to call iCitizens) ranging across two axes of producers to consumers, and those seeking anonymity to those seeking notoriety. How you approach, interact with, engage, and harness those customers changes depending on where they fall on the grid.

Some interesting points from her keynote:

  • The passive web experience is dead, the new chief online behaviors are Creating, Influencing, and Sharing.
  • The web is projected to influence 50% of offline sales by 2012.
  • The new purchase funnel is non-linear, multi-channel, and digital first. Inital touchpoints can be upwards of 90, purchase options are vast, and there’s a post-transaction consumer participation element.
  • People spend 3.5 billion minutes on Facebook every day.
  • There are over 18 million Twitter users in the US.
  • 77% of shoppers use online research resources.
  • Hulu streams have grown 6x year-over-year to 373 million.

At the end of the first day, a fleet (yes, fleet) of charter buses shuttled everyone to the beautiful Indianapolis Museum of Art for an elegant night of networking, food, and drink (they had a Scotch bar, for crying-out-loud, this is what I mean by attention to detail). 

Day 2

The second day of the conference was full of breakout sessions divided between five different tracks.

"How to Develop an Effective 1-to-1 Marketing Strategy" – Strategy Track

Billed as a "how to" session on developing and implementing a segmented, targeted email marketing strategy, I was very excited about this session. Chris Murray from ExactTarget led off with a nicely bulleted framework for evaluating your company’s current plan and setting goals for moving forward into a more advanced strategy.  Chris definitely stressed the importance of making time for strategy before you start executing. I felt his approach was both practical and general enough that is can serve as a great jumping-off point for anybody looking to develop their marketing strategy for any vector, whether email or otherwise. Here’s how he broke things down:

Start with a basic, three question Strategy Development Framework

  • Where are you now?
  • Where do you want to go?
  • How will you get there?

Step 1: Where are you now? Assessment. Analysis, and Auditing

  • Evaluate list health (size, age, accuracy, engagement)
  • Review past email performance metrics (open rate, click through, etc.)
  • Review Deliverability metrics (important to know where you stand with major ISPs)
  • Look at your existing customer data, insights, and segmentation. If you don’t know much about your customers, you need to ask them, consider creating and incentivizing surveys.
  • Perform competitive analysis. Look at what others are doing well and see how you can emulate or improve on it.
  • Evaluate your available resources (budget, creative, technological, etc.)

Step 2: Where do you want to go? Setting Goals

  • Determine what you want to achieve through your campaign(s):
    • Brand Awareness
    • Lead Generation
    • Customer Retention/Activation
    • Revenue Growth
  • When setting your goals in any/all of these areas, be S.M.A.R.T. (be sure your goals are Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Realistic, and Timely).

Step 3: How will you get there? Devising your Strategy

  • Solidify segments and targets
  • Decide which vehicle is best for each target (email, SMS, voice, etc.)
  • Decide how best to attract targets (this helps drive touchpoints: in-store, on-site, via phone, etc.)
  • Get their attention (evaluate and test creative, content, subject lines, etc.)

Look End-to-End: It’s critical to consider all of your marketing in terms of a 360-degree view of the customer lifecycle and devise your strategy with an overall, full-cycle approach in mind. For instance, you may want to consider where each piece of your strategy fits in terms of:

  • Opt-In
  • Welcome Approach
  • Touch Points
  • Preference Gathering
  • Activation/Purchase
  • Opt-Out/Down
  • Re-Engagement

After Chris presented his excellent strategy framework, Dela Quist of Alchemy Worx took to the mic for a presentation he called "Fear & Self-Loathing in Email Marketing."  While Dela’s presentation didn’t quite fit the "how to" billing of the session, it was incredibly interesting and provided lots of great takeaways. His primary message was that email marketers often get beat-up and made to feel guilty because they’re all looked at as spammers (even though most aren’t) and the key performance metrics of open rate and click-through rate for individual mail campaigns are grossly misleading in terms of measuring effectiveness.  Dela can be a somewhat controversial guy, but I found him to be an engaging presenter and much of what he said really made me rethink how I want to formulate and evaluate elements of my email planning and strategy:

On how email is perceived:

  • Email marketing is the only channel consumers can turn off at will.
  • On average, consumers sign up to receive email from 12 brands. With weekly contact, that’s only 48 emails per month, which no reasonable person can consider "overload".
  • If you bought every single commercial in the Super Bowl, you’d be seen as rich, cool, and clever; but if you send two emails a month, you’re somehow a spammer and an idiot?!?

On how marketers can improve the way they think about email:

  • The only pattern in email marketing is that most people don’t open most emails.
  • Numbers always go down over time when we look at opens and clicks. Looking at campaigns instead of people is a bad metric.
  • Use Cumulative Unique Open Rate: What % of users opened at least one email over the last X months. This is a metric you can work to improve over time and it provides a better indicator of program performance.
  • It’s important to look at new subscribers and old subscribers differently.
  • Do NOT try to emulate Amazon if you don’t have thousands of products to serially convert with.
  • Think of email as a brand mechanism, not just a direct response channel (-This really opened my eyes)
    • There’s an opportunity for nudge effect even w/ unopened email. People are highly engaged when doing email triage.
    • Studies show that after sending an email, search volume usually goes up, and more unopened people end up converting passively than those that convert directly through the email.
    • Users who open and click an email a week or two after it’s sent convert much higher than those that open and click right away.
    • Email is subtle and sophisticated, so stop using it like a sledgehammer.

"Designed by Success" – Content Track

This design panel, featuring Tim Sinkola from ET, Bill McCloskey from Email Data Source, Mike Corack from Mighty Interactive, and Chad White from Smith-Harmon, looked at groups of emails from different brands and evaluated them for design and content.  It was really interesting to look at welcome messages, newsletters, transactional mails, and more from major brands and get a chance to compare and contrast them with the input of some top-notch design pros.  I’ll quickly walk you through each category of email that was examined and give you the valuable take-aways for each:

Welcome Emails:

  • These have the largest open rate, so spend time on them! Include good links, good offers, and brand yourself.
  • Include a member ID, username, or password…something that will make people save the email to improve future deliverability.
  • Strong calls-to-action (including social CTAs) can be very effective in welcome messages.
  • Don’t emulate your website nav in emails: they’re two different animals. Keep email nav to <5 links.

Newsletters:

  • Avoid huge hero images, they’re usually blocked. Be sure to include a non-image CTA.
  • Only 11% of subscribers scroll below the fold, so move offers and CTAs up the page.
  • Think of images as supporting elements and make sure email renders well with and without images.
  • Link people back to your site, they’re going to convert on the site, not in your email.
  • Social forward and interactivity can be hugely effective.

Product-based Emails:

  • Social sharing links (preferably top-right) can be fantastic.
  • Explain the value of your CTA and justification for social sharing.
  • Use personalization selectively, there’s falloff if you go overboard.

Offer Emails:

  • Use what you know about customers to craft relevant offers for them.
  • Including a barcode in an email offer can improve conversion attribution for brick-and-mortar businesses.
  • Promote sales offers with text, aspirational branding with images.

Transactional Messages:

  • Maintain a consistent look and feel across all transactional emails.
  • Include cross-sell opportunities if/when appropriate for the customer.
  • When including promotional materials, limit it to no more than 20% of the email content, and make sure transactional info is top-left for prominence.

"Research Survey Says" – Content Track

There are tons of market research studies out there, and it can be really difficult to divine the important bits of info from all of them. This session attempted to focus attention to some of the most relevant data related to email marketing from several recent studies to answer the questions: Is email dying? What are the real and perceived threats? Panelists Morgan Stewart from ET, Julie Katz from Forrester, Rebecca Lieb from eConsultancy, and Stefan Tornquist from Marketing Sherpa offered these insights:

  • Marketers love the idea of mobile and social, but they’re not hurting email.
  • Among consumers, email does have slowing growth, but also the lowest falloff among social, text, and IM.
  • Teens may not perceive themselves as using email, but most have email accounts and they use them actively once they get to college-age.
  • Email and SEO rank highest among marketers for happiness with ROI (well above PPC, Social, Mobile, and Display).
  • Email is so easy and cheap, that it can be used ineffectively and still get results – and that’s a problem. 
  • 72% of marketers say they could be using email better!
  • 42% of marketers don’t know their ROI from Email.
  • The top two reasons (by far) customers unsubscribe: 1) Emails aren’t relevant to them. 2) Received too many emails from sender.
  • Consumers overwhelmingly demonstrate that they now demand greater control of email frequency, content, and easy unsubscribe/preference controls.

That concluded sessions for Day 2 (there was one more in the middle of the day, but I had some other work to attend to). The day finished with an armada of chartered buses taking everyone to the Murat Theater for a hysterical comedy performance by Second City, followed by a They Might Be Giants concert! Again, the extravagance, detail, and execution of this event put even the biggest parties I’ve seen Google or Microsoft throw to shame.

They Might Be Giants at COnnections '09
They Might Be Giants play Connections ’09

DAY 3

The final day of the conference started off early for me as I joined five other folks bright-and-early for a small business discussion panel with several reps from ExactTarget.  It was refreshing to hear how similar the problems were that we all faced, despite our businesses being very different. The ExactTarget reps were extremely receptive to our input and seemed to take even our most minor gripes very seriously.  It was a fantastic opportunity for giving and gathering customer feedback, one I definitely hope to emulate at events we put on in the future.

"Extreme Makeover: Email Design Competition"

There were two major events scheduled for the closing hours of the event. First was the "Extreme Makeover: Email Design Competition" which pitted teams from ExactTarget, Mighty Interactive, and Smith-Harmon against each other to redesign emails for Pier 1 Imports, AAA, and Marketing Experiments.  The redesigned emails were then tested against each other (and the original design) and evaluated based on several metrics appropriate for the campaign. The audience was also invited to vote via text for their favorite in each competition.

Unfortunately, I don’t have images of the competing emails to show you, so my notes wouldn’t make much sense.  It was very cool, however, to see the different approaches these teams took to each email, and hear their reasoning behind it. 

Mighty Interactive won the competition for the Pier 1 Imports email (ExactTarget was the audience pick). They stuck closest to the feel of the original Pier 1 design (which actually outperformed all of the re-designs!), which seems to indicate that Pier 1 customers are pretty set in their ways and reluctant to see content presented in a drastically different style.

ExactTarget won the competition for the AAA email (ET was also the audience pick) with an unorthodox, side-scrolling email. I was shocked considering the average age of AAA customers. I thought for sure the unusual navigation would cause confusion and poor results. Clearly I was wrong since they outperformed the control design by 26%!

Smith-Harmon won the competition for the Marketing Experiments email (S-H was also the audience pick) with their clean, colorful newsletter design. Their design outperformed the control by 26% in click-through rate, and reduced unsubscribes by 15.9%. Very solid performance by a cool little company from right here in Seattle.

Marlee Matlin

Marlee Matlin

The conference closed with a final keynote by Academy Award-winning actress, producer, and author, Marlee Matlin, who also happens to deaf.  Marlee, with the help of her interpreter, Jack, delivered a powerful and emotional speech about overcoming challenges, following your dreams, and designing your own success story.  Alas, there aren’t a lot of actionable business takeaways I can provide from her presentation, but I can tell you that her message of courage and strength is relevant to any business-person out there, especially the entrepreneurial spirits that populate the online marketing world.

Overall, I found Connections ’09 to be an extremely impressive blend of useful, actionable information; thought-provoking and inspiring speakers; and superb networking events, all presented with world-class style and polish. As a first-time attendee, I was thoroughly, thoroughly impressed. Anyone who works with email marketing – even if you don’t use ExactTarget – should absolutely look into attending next year. I’ll almost certainly be there, and hopefully I’ll have the chance to drag some more Mozzers along with me.

Do you like this post? Yes No

Posted by great scott!

We don’t talk about email marketing on the blog much, but any of you working in the internet marketing space (and that’s likely all of you) probably know that it’s still one of the most effective marketing channels out there. 

We’ve been fortunate enough over the years to partner with ExactTarget for our email marketing services and as they’ve grown and improved their offerings they constantly make me feel terrible.  Don’t get me wrong, they’re awesome, in fact they’re too awesome. The stuff their system is capable of and the one-to-one, closed-loop strategies they evangelize are amazing and I feel terrible that I haven’t been able to implement every concept they’ve thrown my way.  Nonetheless, I’m a huge fan, so mozPal, all-around great guy, and ExactTarget VP of Marketing, Jeff Rohrs, invited me to attend Connections ’09, ET’s annual user conference in their hometown of Indianapolis last week.

Don’t run away just yet. While Connections is theoretically designed as a user conference, I went in specifically with the outlook of a platform-agnostic email marketer in order to evaluate the content and value of the conference for you, dear reader.  Yes, there was a fair amount of ExactTarget rah-rah, but bottom line: if you’re interested in email marketing, there were great lessons to be learned (and awesome parties to attend) regardless of whether you actually use ET or not. Since interesting and actionable takeaways are what we all want to get out of conferences, let me take you through a rundown of the sessions I attended, as well as some of the things that garnered large, scribbled asterisks or frantic underlines in my notes (yeah, I’m an analog kid, I take notes with a pen and paper, do I lose my membership in the club?).

DAY 1

The first day was all about keynote presentations. I have to take a second to call out the production values of this seminar. The main ballroom where all of the keynotes were held was incredible. Giant screens everywhere, slick lighting and signage, multiple cameras to re-broadcast the speakers onto screens, lighted backdrops, the whole nine. I’ve been to a good handful of conferences from the tiny to the huge, and this was by far the slickest, most smoothly run, and most impressively produced I’ve ever seen (apparently coordinated by Seattle-area event firm HB Stubbs). All other search industry shows (SEOmoz included) should strive to meet the quality and attention to detail ET puts into Connections…seriously.

Connections '09 Main Stage
The main stage at Connections ’09

Scott Dorsey, CEO & Scott McCorkle, COO ExactTarget

The ET C-suite kicked things off with a pleasant, though painfully scripted, welcome message. There were some cool feature announcements, but as I said, this is a platform agnostic event review, so I’ll spare you the details. Scott Dorsey did drop some interesting statistics that I thought were quite impressive though:

  • ET clients send 2 billion emails every month.
  • They create 1 billion new contacts and records every day.
  • ET currently manages 100 Terabytes of data for their customers (that’s 10x the Library of Congress)
  • A study they conducted with Forrester showed that only 15% of consumers want all of their marketing communication through email.
  • The same study also showed that, in general, consumers prefer email 300% over other delivery methods.

Malcolm Gladwell

Malcolm Gladwell

Talk about bringing out the big guns right away, the second speech of the entire event was sociologist and best-selling author Malcolm Gladwell, best know for his books The Tipping Point, Blink, and Outliers (Umm, did I mention everyone in attendance was given an autographed, hard-bound copy of Outliers in their swag bag? Slightly cooler than a t-shirt.).

Gladwell spoke about his findings in his latest book, Outliers, which studied the backgrounds of successful individuals, looking for patterns that determine success.  He used the band Fleetwood Mac as his example for this presentation.  Most people (myself included) think of Fleetwood Mac as a band that emerged out of nowhere in the 70′s with their eponymous "debut" album, which they soon followed with Rumors, one of the most influential and best-selling albums of all time (OF ALL TIME!).  Well, turns out we’re all wrong. Fleetwood Mac started in 1967 and released 15 largely ignored albums under a kaleidoscope of various lineups before finding success in 1975 with Fleetwood Mac.

Turns out, in Gladwell’s studies, this pattern is almost without exception. People considered successful experts in their field almost always exhibit 10,000 hours or more of study, practice, and dedication to their craft or skill-set before they reach success.

Great, Scott, but where’s that valuable takeaway you promised? 

In our world of the internet it can be all too easy to hold ourselves to impossible standards of overnight, instant success. What Gladwell’s study shows is that we greatly underestimate the amount of time and effort that goes into success. There’s little that’s truly arbitrary or mysterious about success; it has a logic, a pattern, and a consistent architecture: it requires effort, hard work, and time. We put too much emphasis on "talent" and "luck" when, in reality, they’re minor contributors.  Expecting yourself to stumble upon that figurative lottery ticket is a lot of pressure to put on yourself and brings with it huge potential for disappointment. Isn’t it more comforting to know that your success can be designed? Relax, even the Beatles spent their first several years playing as a cover band in a strip club in Hamburg, Germany…great things can come from humble beginnings, just give yourself a chance to put in the effort.

Kelly Mooney, CEO Resource Interactive

Kelly Mooney

Author and CEO of Resource Interactive, Kelly Mooney, followed Gladwell with a presentation on her concept of the "O.P.E.N. Imperitive," her model for creating an open brand that engages with users on the social web. It’s a very cool model to work from and one that I think can really help any company working to develop a social strategy. Her new book on the concept, The Open Brand, is probably worth a look. 

Kelly’s model creates a spectrum of online consumers (which she prefers to call iCitizens) ranging across two axes of producers to consumers, and those seeking anonymity to those seeking notoriety. How you approach, interact with, engage, and harness those customers changes depending on where they fall on the grid.

Some interesting points from her keynote:

  • The passive web experience is dead, the new chief online behaviors are Creating, Influencing, and Sharing.
  • The web is projected to influence 50% of offline sales by 2012.
  • The new purchase funnel is non-linear, multi-channel, and digital first. Inital touchpoints can be upwards of 90, purchase options are vast, and there’s a post-transaction consumer participation element.
  • People spend 3.5 billion minutes on Facebook every day.
  • There are over 18 million Twitter users in the US.
  • 77% of shoppers use online research resources.
  • Hulu streams have grown 6x year-over-year to 373 million.

At the end of the first day, a fleet (yes, fleet) of charter buses shuttled everyone to the beautiful Indianapolis Museum of Art for an elegant night of networking, food, and drink (they had a Scotch bar, for crying-out-loud, this is what I mean by attention to detail). 

Day 2

The second day of the conference was full of breakout sessions divided between five different tracks.

"How to Develop an Effective 1-to-1 Marketing Strategy" – Strategy Track

Billed as a "how to" session on developing and implementing a segmented, targeted email marketing strategy, I was very excited about this session. Chris Murray from ExactTarget led off with a nicely bulleted framework for evaluating your company’s current plan and setting goals for moving forward into a more advanced strategy.  Chris definitely stressed the importance of making time for strategy before you start executing. I felt his approach was both practical and general enough that is can serve as a great jumping-off point for anybody looking to develop their marketing strategy for any vector, whether email or otherwise. Here’s how he broke things down:

Start with a basic, three question Strategy Development Framework

  • Where are you now?
  • Where do you want to go?
  • How will you get there?

Step 1: Where are you now? Assessment. Analysis, and Auditing

  • Evaluate list health (size, age, accuracy, engagement)
  • Review past email performance metrics (open rate, click through, etc.)
  • Review Deliverability metrics (important to know where you stand with major ISPs)
  • Look at your existing customer data, insights, and segmentation. If you don’t know much about your customers, you need to ask them, consider creating and incentivizing surveys.
  • Perform competitive analysis. Look at what others are doing well and see how you can emulate or improve on it.
  • Evaluate your available resources (budget, creative, technological, etc.)

Step 2: Where do you want to go? Setting Goals

  • Determine what you want to achieve through your campaign(s):
    • Brand Awareness
    • Lead Generation
    • Customer Retention/Activation
    • Revenue Growth
  • When setting your goals in any/all of these areas, be S.M.A.R.T. (be sure your goals are Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Realistic, and Timely).

Step 3: How will you get there? Devising your Strategy

  • Solidify segments and targets
  • Decide which vehicle is best for each target (email, SMS, voice, etc.)
  • Decide how best to attract targets (this helps drive touchpoints: in-store, on-site, via phone, etc.)
  • Get their attention (evaluate and test creative, content, subject lines, etc.)

Look End-to-End: It’s critical to consider all of your marketing in terms of a 360-degree view of the customer lifecycle and devise your strategy with an overall, full-cycle approach in mind. For instance, you may want to consider where each piece of your strategy fits in terms of:

  • Opt-In
  • Welcome Approach
  • Touch Points
  • Preference Gathering
  • Activation/Purchase
  • Opt-Out/Down
  • Re-Engagement

After Chris presented his excellent strategy framework, Dela Quist of Alchemy Worx took to the mic for a presentation he called "Fear & Self-Loathing in Email Marketing."  While Dela’s presentation didn’t quite fit the "how to" billing of the session, it was incredibly interesting and provided lots of great takeaways. His primary message was that email marketers often get beat-up and made to feel guilty because they’re all looked at as spammers (even though most aren’t) and the key performance metrics of open rate and click-through rate for individual mail campaigns are grossly misleading in terms of measuring effectiveness.  Dela can be a somewhat controversial guy, but I found him to be an engaging presenter and much of what he said really made me rethink how I want to formulate and evaluate elements of my email planning and strategy:

On how email is perceived:

  • Email marketing is the only channel consumers can turn off at will.
  • On average, consumers sign up to receive email from 12 brands. With weekly contact, that’s only 48 emails per month, which no reasonable person can consider "overload".
  • If you bought every single commercial in the Super Bowl, you’d be seen as rich, cool, and clever; but if you send two emails a month, you’re somehow a spammer and an idiot?!?

On how marketers can improve the way they think about email:

  • The only pattern in email marketing is that most people don’t open most emails.
  • Numbers always go down over time when we look at opens and clicks. Looking at campaigns instead of people is a bad metric.
  • Use Cumulative Unique Open Rate: What % of users opened at least one email over the last X months. This is a metric you can work to improve over time and it provides a better indicator of program performance.
  • It’s important to look at new subscribers and old subscribers differently.
  • Do NOT try to emulate Amazon if you don’t have thousands of products to serially convert with.
  • Think of email as a brand mechanism, not just a direct response channel (-This really opened my eyes)
    • There’s an opportunity for nudge effect even w/ unopened email. People are highly engaged when doing email triage.
    • Studies show that after sending an email, search volume usually goes up, and more unopened people end up converting passively than those that convert directly through the email.
    • Users who open and click an email a week or two after it’s sent convert much higher than those that open and click right away.
    • Email is subtle and sophisticated, so stop using it like a sledgehammer.

"Designed by Success" – Content Track

This design panel, featuring Tim Sinkola from ET, Bill McCloskey from Email Data Source, Mike Corack from Mighty Interactive, and Chad White from Smith-Harmon, looked at groups of emails from different brands and evaluated them for design and content.  It was really interesting to look at welcome messages, newsletters, transactional mails, and more from major brands and get a chance to compare and contrast them with the input of some top-notch design pros.  I’ll quickly walk you through each category of email that was examined and give you the valuable take-aways for each:

Welcome Emails:

  • These have the largest open rate, so spend time on them! Include good links, good offers, and brand yourself.
  • Include a member ID, username, or password…something that will make people save the email to improve future deliverability.
  • Strong calls-to-action (including social CTAs) can be very effective in welcome messages.
  • Don’t emulate your website nav in emails: they’re two different animals. Keep email nav to <5 links.

Newsletters:

  • Avoid huge hero images, they’re usually blocked. Be sure to include a non-image CTA.
  • Only 11% of subscribers scroll below the fold, so move offers and CTAs up the page.
  • Think of images as supporting elements and make sure email renders well with and without images.
  • Link people back to your site, they’re going to convert on the site, not in your email.
  • Social forward and interactivity can be hugely effective.

Product-based Emails:

  • Social sharing links (preferably top-right) can be fantastic.
  • Explain the value of your CTA and justification for social sharing.
  • Use personalization selectively, there’s falloff if you go overboard.

Offer Emails:

  • Use what you know about customers to craft relevant offers for them.
  • Including a barcode in an email offer can improve conversion attribution for brick-and-mortar businesses.
  • Promote sales offers with text, aspirational branding with images.

Transactional Messages:

  • Maintain a consistent look and feel across all transactional emails.
  • Include cross-sell opportunities if/when appropriate for the customer.
  • When including promotional materials, limit it to no more than 20% of the email content, and make sure transactional info is top-left for prominence.

"Research Survey Says" – Content Track

There are tons of market research studies out there, and it can be really difficult to divine the important bits of info from all of them. This session attempted to focus attention to some of the most relevant data related to email marketing from several recent studies to answer the questions: Is email dying? What are the real and perceived threats? Panelists Morgan Stewart from ET, Julie Katz from Forrester, Rebecca Lieb from eConsultancy, and Stefan Tornquist from Marketing Sherpa offered these insights:

  • Marketers love the idea of mobile and social, but they’re not hurting email.
  • Among consumers, email does have slowing growth, but also the lowest falloff among social, text, and IM.
  • Teens may not perceive themselves as using email, but most have email accounts and they use them actively once they get to college-age.
  • Email and SEO rank highest among marketers for happiness with ROI (well above PPC, Social, Mobile, and Display).
  • Email is so easy and cheap, that it can be used ineffectively and still get results – and that’s a problem. 
  • 72% of marketers say they could be using email better!
  • 42% of marketers don’t know their ROI from Email.
  • The top two reasons (by far) customers unsubscribe: 1) Emails aren’t relevant to them. 2) Received too many emails from sender.
  • Consumers overwhelmingly demonstrate that they now demand greater control of email frequency, content, and easy unsubscribe/preference controls.

That concluded sessions for Day 2 (there was one more in the middle of the day, but I had some other work to attend to). The day finished with an armada of chartered buses taking everyone to the Murat Theater for a hysterical comedy performance by Second City, followed by a They Might Be Giants concert! Again, the extravagance, detail, and execution of this event put even the biggest parties I’ve seen Google or Microsoft throw to shame.

They Might Be Giants at COnnections '09
They Might Be Giants play Connections ’09

DAY 3

The final day of the conference started off early for me as I joined five other folks bright-and-early for a small business discussion panel with several reps from ExactTarget.  It was refreshing to hear how similar the problems were that we all faced, despite our businesses being very different. The ExactTarget reps were extremely receptive to our input and seemed to take even our most minor gripes very seriously.  It was a fantastic opportunity for giving and gathering customer feedback, one I definitely hope to emulate at events we put on in the future.

"Extreme Makeover: Email Design Competition"

There were two major events scheduled for the closing hours of the event. First was the "Extreme Makeover: Email Design Competition" which pitted teams from ExactTarget, Mighty Interactive, and Smith-Harmon against each other to redesign emails for Pier 1 Imports, AAA, and Marketing Experiments.  The redesigned emails were then tested against each other (and the original design) and evaluated based on several metrics appropriate for the campaign. The audience was also invited to vote via text for their favorite in each competition.

Unfortunately, I don’t have images of the competing emails to show you, so my notes wouldn’t make much sense.  It was very cool, however, to see the different approaches these teams took to each email, and hear their reasoning behind it. 

Mighty Interactive won the competition for the Pier 1 Imports email (ExactTarget was the audience pick). They stuck closest to the feel of the original Pier 1 design (which actually outperformed all of the re-designs!), which seems to indicate that Pier 1 customers are pretty set in their ways and reluctant to see content presented in a drastically different style.

ExactTarget won the competition for the AAA email (ET was also the audience pick) with an unorthodox, side-scrolling email. I was shocked considering the average age of AAA customers. I thought for sure the unusual navigation would cause confusion and poor results. Clearly I was wrong since they outperformed the control design by 26%!

Smith-Harmon won the competition for the Marketing Experiments email (S-H was also the audience pick) with their clean, colorful newsletter design. Their design outperformed the control by 26% in click-through rate, and reduced unsubscribes by 15.9%. Very solid performance by a cool little company from right here in Seattle.

Marlee Matlin

Marlee Matlin

The conference closed with a final keynote by Academy Award-winning actress, producer, and author, Marlee Matlin, who also happens to deaf.  Marlee, with the help of her interpreter, Jack, delivered a powerful and emotional speech about overcoming challenges, following your dreams, and designing your own success story.  Alas, there aren’t a lot of actionable business takeaways I can provide from her presentation, but I can tell you that her message of courage and strength is relevant to any business-person out there, especially the entrepreneurial spirits that populate the online marketing world.

Overall, I found Connections ’09 to be an extremely impressive blend of useful, actionable information; thought-provoking and inspiring speakers; and superb networking events, all presented with world-class style and polish. As a first-time attendee, I was thoroughly, thoroughly impressed. Anyone who works with email marketing – even if you don’t use ExactTarget – should absolutely look into attending next year. I’ll almost certainly be there, and hopefully I’ll have the chance to drag some more Mozzers along with me.

Do you like this post? Yes No

Seth Godin: Sliced Bread

Malcolm Gladwell: Outliers

Anthony Parinello: Your Price is Too High