Get Your Visitor Experience Right

Have you ever visited a website and got frustrated because you either couldn’t find the contact information or had a hard time locating the path needed to be taken to make it through the website correctly? It is called user experience and if you get it wrong and forget to really apply it to your [...]

Have you ever visited a website and got frustrated because you either couldn’t find the contact information or had a hard time locating the path needed to be taken to make it through the website correctly? It is called user experience and if you get it wrong and forget to really apply it to your website than your SEO is going to go down the drain. Optimization means all aspects of a website not just search.

Before you think about launching an SEO campaign to drive targeted visitors have you stopped and taken a long hard look at your website? If you are not aware of how your user should be engaging with your website you might want to have someone do a really thorough conversion audit before you start driving traffic to it. The last thing a website owner wants to do is spend a great deal of money trying to drive visitors to a website only for the visitor to arrive and leave due to a poor user experience. Your website visitor needs something to do in order to stay on your website. You don’t want them leaving due to boredom or lack of direction. Lead them down a path to your ultimate business goal. Remember that user experience is just about converting that visitor into a lead or a sale. It is also about creating an emotion for that user so that they engage with your website a bit more than normal.

Your website needs to pull some sort of emotion out of your visitors whether it is from an engaging video, blog or you guessed it, your content!. It is not just about launching a campaign and trying to dump targeted visitors and crossing your fingers hoping they might call or make a purchase. Give them something to do and smile about. Create a community type feeling around your website and give people a reason to bookmark it.

http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com

Tynt Is A Cool Specialized Analytic Service

John Battelle’s recent post as well as an email from a friend turned me to Tynt. John goes into a bunch of detail that I won’t repeat here, but essentially what Tynt does is tracks what people are copying and pasting from your site’s content while also adding an attribution link to your site [...]

John Battelle’s recent post as well as an email from a friend turned me to Tynt. John goes into a bunch of detail that I won’t repeat here, but essentially what Tynt does is tracks what people are copying and pasting from your site’s content while also adding an attribution link to your site when they do so.

This is a great idea. It’s a little bit shocking nobody has thought of this until now, but it’s a very useful tool for publishers in a few different ways:

  • Generate more links and traffic to your site – Every time any of your content is pasted into email or a blog post Tynt’s code adds a link to the page the content was copied from. This will help drive users back to the original content, as well as potentially help search engine ranking if those attribution links make it onto web pages.
  • See what type of content is being copied – Tynt provides analytics that shows you what content is being shared and how much traffic it is driving. This can be useful to learn what type of content you should create more of, and what types of people are sharing it so you can see if you’re getting engagement from key audiences.
  • Generate revenue from searches – Tynt recognizes short pieces of copied text as likely searches, and intercepts the search going to one of the major engines and then plans to share the revenue from searches that result in ad clicks with the publishers. I’m not sure this is fully scaled yet, but it looks like a potential revenue stream for larger publishers that could be worthwhile.

That being said, I think Tynt would be more powerful built into a pre-existing analytics service. Having to go to another place to check out your “copy and paste” stats separate from the rest of your analytics is a pain. Additionally, having to place another code snippet on your page is not ideal either, it’d be much easier if this was part of an analytics package that already existed today. Maybe this makes Tynt an acquisition target down the road by either a larger analytic company or one of the search engines who wants to serve search results on Tynt copy and paste search queries. Interesting stuff.

http://www.conversionrater.com

Google “Answer Highlighting” Upsets Webmasters

Google announced two new features in their web results. First is called “Answer Highlighting” and the second is an enhancement to the Rich Snippets feature.

Answer Highlighting in short basically uses Google Squared technology to highlight in the search snippet the answer to your search query. For example, and I don’t see this in the live Google results right now, if you search for [empire state height], in the past (current) you would have seen this:

Google Snippets via Google Square

With the enhancement, you would see the answer:

Google Snippets via Google Square

Getting the answer in the search results, is a goal of Google, but that means, or can mean, less click throughs from Google to your web site. Webmasters often live off traffic and conversions, so this can be a bit upsetting to many webmasters.

Brett Tabke said in a WebmasterWorld thread:

Taking another page out of the WolframAlpha play book, Google introduces Serps with answers. You may never need to visit any site again.

The other enhancement is allowing event data in rich snippets. How does that improve the feature? Just look at this snippet:

Google Rich Snippets for Events

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


Google announced two new features in their web results. First is called "Answer Highlighting" and the second is an enhancement to the Rich Snippets feature.

Answer Highlighting in short basically uses Google Squared technology to highlight in the search snippet the answer to your search query. For example, and I don't see this in the live Google results right now, if you search for [empire state height], in the past (current) you would have seen this:

Google Snippets via Google Square

With the enhancement, you would see the answer:

Google Snippets via Google Square

Getting the answer in the search results, is a goal of Google, but that means, or can mean, less click throughs from Google to your web site. Webmasters often live off traffic and conversions, so this can be a bit upsetting to many webmasters.

Brett Tabke said in a WebmasterWorld thread:

Taking another page out of the WolframAlpha play book, Google introduces Serps with answers. You may never need to visit any site again.

The other enhancement is allowing event data in rich snippets. How does that improve the feature? Just look at this snippet:

Google Rich Snippets for Events

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


http://www.seroundtable.com/

A Real Yahoo Search Update for January 2010?

Earlier this month, we reported on a rumored Yahoo Search update. Although it appeared to be an update, the consensus was that what people were seeing was the paid inclusion being weeded out of the organic search results.

But the thread at WebmasterWorld has been updated by BillyS, who often tracks Yahoo. Billy thinks that Yahoo is now updating, for real, this time. He said:

Yahoo tweaked something today around 1:30 until 3:00 Eastern time. We had a huge spike in traffic. Anyone else see this?

Yahoo updates typically don’t get as much reaction as a Google update. And over the past year or so, Yahoo updates have received a lot less attention then they have in the past. This is likely due to them losing search market share and giving up to Bing.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


Earlier this month, we reported on a rumored Yahoo Search update. Although it appeared to be an update, the consensus was that what people were seeing was the paid inclusion being weeded out of the organic search results.

But the thread at WebmasterWorld has been updated by BillyS, who often tracks Yahoo. Billy thinks that Yahoo is now updating, for real, this time. He said:

Yahoo tweaked something today around 1:30 until 3:00 Eastern time. We had a huge spike in traffic. Anyone else see this?

Yahoo updates typically don't get as much reaction as a Google update. And over the past year or so, Yahoo updates have received a lot less attention then they have in the past. This is likely due to them losing search market share and giving up to Bing.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


http://www.seroundtable.com/

Q & A About Using Q & A Sites to Build Your Business & Reputation

Posted by Gil Reich

This post was originally in YOUmoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author’s views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.

Q&A sites are a great way to get your message across and to build your brand and reputation.

How many people use Q&A sites?

  • In a recent Business.com study, 49% of companies that use social media said they ask questions on Q&A sites. Only 29% said they use Twitter to find business-related information. The 49% doesn’t even include the many who get info from Q&A sites by Googling or Binging.
  • Answers.com (where I work) is now ranked (by comScore) as the 17th most visited site in the US. The vast majority of Answers.com’s traffic is to user generated Q&A pages. Yahoo! Answers gets even more traffic. Much of your potential market is already getting their answers from these sites.

Business Answer Usefulness

Source: Social Media Best Practices: Question & Answer Forums. Business.com, December 14, 2009, http://www.business.com/info/social-media-best-practices-q-and-a

What’s in it for me?

Providing quality answers and links to relevant pages can help you in the following ways:

  • Direct your customers (and potential customers) to accurate information about your product.
  • Connect with people in your market, build your reputation, and generate leads.
  • Provide links back to your site. Some of these links are Follow links, and thus also provide SEO value.

How do I use these sites?

The general rules of social media apply here too:

  1. Help others
  2. Build relationships
  3. Push your products and services when they answer somebody’s question or request.

Q&A sites work great for this, because people are already asking the questions. When I blog I hope my posts address questions that my readers want answered, but they may not. In Q&A sites, your starting point is that somebody asked the queston that you’re answering.

Specifically:

  • Search the Q&A sites for questions about your subject, and browse the relevant categories.
  • Answer questions fairly and accurately. If appropriate, mention your product or service, and / or link to a relevant page on your site.
  • Follow up & interact where appropriate. Use these sites’ message boards to see if you can be of further help, or to congratulate another contributor for a great answer.
  • Fill in your User Profile, showing why people should like and trust you. You can also usually link to your site from your User Profile.

In the example below, notice how the user provided a quality answer (much of which follows a template he uses in other answers as well) and adds a relevant link to his site.Quality (and Self Serving) Answer

 

What are the leading sites and how do they differ?

  • Yahoo! Answers: The biggest site in the industry, with 47 million US visits in November according to comScore (and that’s probably a very conservative estimate). It’s a broad horizontal site. Questions are open for 4 days. Users answer the question, and vote on the best answer. The best answer is selected by either the asker or by the community.
  • Answers.com / WikiAnswers: Answers.com has 41 million monthly US visitors according to comScore, making it second to Yahoo! but far larger than the other Q&A sites. It’s also a broad horizontal site. It’s key differentiators are:
    • It’s connectd to a reference site, so if you ask "What is the abstention doctrine?" your answer will come from West’s Law and the Oxford University Press.
    • It’s a wiki, so instead of multiple users providing multiple answers, users collaborate on one answer.
    • In most cases Answers don’t get closed, so you can find questions asked more than 4 days ago and still contribute to the answer.
  • LinkedIn Answers & Business.com Answers: These sites are great for more targeted communication, lead generation, and reputation building. Think of Yahoo! Answers and Answers.com as more B2C, and these sites as more B2B. This is Q&A in the context of advanced professional networking sites.
  • Stack Overflow and its siblings: Stack Overflow is a great Q&A site for programmers. If you’re a software developer and you want to establish yourself as an expert and to network with your peers, this site’s perfect. The same technology is now powering other niche sites, most notably serverfault.com (for system administrators) and Answers on Startups, which Rand Fishkin just named one of the 10 Sources I’ve Come to Love.
  • Aardvark: Aardvark is more of a closed system where you ask questions to people in your network. This is great for well connected journalists and bloggers to get answers from their network, but may not be ideal for spreading your message beyond your social circle.

How is using them like doing a guest post on SEOmoz?

Answering questions on Q&A sites is exactly like doing a guest post on SEOmoz:

  • Find the sites where the people you need are getting their information.
  • Give them quality information that will benefit them.
  • Get your own message across, with full disclosure of who you are. You can be self-serving, but not too self-serving.
  • Build relationships, and establish your expertise.

Ultimately you need a win-win here. You need to serve the needs of the community with whom you’re interacting, in a way that also builds your business and reputation.

Where can I get more information on Q&A sites?

See the following excellent articles:

Or contact me (Answers.com user: Gilr)

Do you like this post? Yes No

Posted by Gil Reich

Q&A sites are a great way to get your message across and to build your brand and reputation.

How many people use Q&A sites?

  • In a recent Business.com study, 49% of companies that use social media said they ask questions on Q&A sites. Only 29% said they use Twitter to find business-related information. The 49% doesn't even include the many who get info from Q&A sites by Googling or Binging.
  • Answers.com (where I work) is now ranked (by comScore) as the 17th most visited site in the US. The vast majority of Answers.com's traffic is to user generated Q&A pages. Yahoo! Answers gets even more traffic. Much of your potential market is already getting their answers from these sites.

Business Answer Usefulness

Source: Social Media Best Practices: Question & Answer Forums. Business.com, December 14, 2009, http://www.business.com/info/social-media-best-practices-q-and-a

What's in it for me?

Providing quality answers and links to relevant pages can help you in the following ways:

  • Direct your customers (and potential customers) to accurate information about your product.
  • Connect with people in your market, build your reputation, and generate leads.
  • Provide links back to your site. Some of these links are Follow links, and thus also provide SEO value.

How do I use these sites?

The general rules of social media apply here too:

  1. Help others
  2. Build relationships
  3. Push your products and services when they answer somebody's question or request.

Q&A sites work great for this, because people are already asking the questions. When I blog I hope my posts address questions that my readers want answered, but they may not. In Q&A sites, your starting point is that somebody asked the queston that you're answering.

Specifically:

  • Search the Q&A sites for questions about your subject, and browse the relevant categories.
  • Answer questions fairly and accurately. If appropriate, mention your product or service, and / or link to a relevant page on your site.
  • Follow up & interact where appropriate. Use these sites' message boards to see if you can be of further help, or to congratulate another contributor for a great answer.
  • Fill in your User Profile, showing why people should like and trust you. You can also usually link to your site from your User Profile.

In the example below, notice how the user provided a quality answer (much of which follows a template he uses in other answers as well) and adds a relevant link to his site.Quality (and Self Serving) Answer

 

What are the leading sites and how do they differ?

  • Yahoo! Answers: The biggest site in the industry, with 47 million US visits in November according to comScore (and that's probably a very conservative estimate). It's a broad horizontal site. Questions are open for 4 days. Users answer the question, and vote on the best answer. The best answer is selected by either the asker or by the community.
  • Answers.com / WikiAnswers: Answers.com has 41 million monthly US visitors according to comScore, making it second to Yahoo! but far larger than the other Q&A sites. It's also a broad horizontal site. It's key differentiators are:
    • It's connectd to a reference site, so if you ask "What is the abstention doctrine?" your answer will come from West's Law and the Oxford University Press.
    • It's a wiki, so instead of multiple users providing multiple answers, users collaborate on one answer.
    • In most cases Answers don't get closed, so you can find questions asked more than 4 days ago and still contribute to the answer.
  • LinkedIn Answers & Business.com Answers: These sites are great for more targeted communication, lead generation, and reputation building. Think of Yahoo! Answers and Answers.com as more B2C, and these sites as more B2B. This is Q&A in the context of advanced professional networking sites.
  • Stack Overflow and its siblings: Stack Overflow is a great Q&A site for programmers. If you're a software developer and you want to establish yourself as an expert and to network with your peers, this site's perfect. The same technology is now powering other niche sites, most notably serverfault.com (for system administrators) and Answers on Startups, which Rand Fishkin just named one of the 10 Sources I've Come to Love.
  • Aardvark: Aardvark is more of a closed system where you ask questions to people in your network. This is great for well connected journalists and bloggers to get answers from their network, but may not be ideal for spreading your message beyond your social circle.

How is using them like doing a guest post on SEOmoz?

Answering questions on Q&A sites is exactly like doing a guest post on SEOmoz:

  • Find the sites where the people you need are getting their information.
  • Give them quality information that will benefit them.
  • Get your own message across, with full disclosure of who you are. You can be self-serving, but not too self-serving.
  • Build relationships, and establish your expertise.

Ultimately you need a win-win here. You need to serve the needs of the community with whom you're interacting, in a way that also builds your business and reputation.

Where can I get more information on Q&A sites?

See the following excellent articles:

Or contact me (Answers.com user: Gilr)

Do you like this post? Yes No

http://www.seomoz.org/blog

Increase the Power of your SEO Efforts

If you have been conducting search engine optimization efforts for your website for some time and you are wondering why things just are not working out like they should you might want to take a step back and take a look at some other factors that could be holding your website back from climbing in [...]

If you have been conducting search engine optimization efforts for your website for some time and you are wondering why things just are not working out like they should you might want to take a step back and take a look at some other factors that could be holding your website back from climbing in the rankings.

Here are a few important areas to consider when marketing your online business:

• Proper Steps?
– Did you dive into link building or did you take the proper steps to optimize your website first? If you’re trying to build links without taking the time to focus on your website first you will never see the results you are looking for. Link building before on-site optimization is a lot like putting the buggy before the horse.

• Brand Power – Have your tired to increase the power of your brand? Strong branding elements often times will get a website visitor to reconsider things when they make it to your website. Try either re-branding or branding your business website even more to get people interested what you have to say. Branding is playing an even more important role in today’s market place than it ever has before. Website traffic wants to see your logo and company info in many different places so make sure that you are branding your business actively.

• Website Structure – This is very important, have you taken them time to make sure the layout of your site is completely ready for your business goals. If your goal is online sales on your online store than you should have many ways for that website visitor to make it to your online store. If you want leads your lead form should be visible on every page of your website. You want to make sure your URL’s to all your web pages are clean and optimized and all content is clearly visible on all your web pages.

• Age of Website – Did you just launch your website a few weeks or months ago? If you just recently launched your website you will have to diversify your marketing approach until you start ranking in search results. Rankings are given to websites who have been around for some time and you have to have your expectations in order when launching a recently new website.

Search engine optimization requires a unique and carved out plan that requires some patience and time to get right. It is more than just building relevant inbound links to your website. It is building a business and on any platform building a business brings its own challenges.

http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com

Find Invisible Pages Using Google Analytics

Posted by wrttnwrd

This post was originally in YOUmoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author’s views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.

One often-ignored part of SEO is making invisible pages visible. When I say ‘invisible’, I mean pages that have received zero clicks from organic search results.

If you can find those pages, you can decide:

  • To keep them, but work to raise their organic search profile;
  • To keep them, but use more of their link juice to help other, higher-profile pages on your site; 
  • Get rid of them, and 301 redirect them to higher-profile, higher-value pages on your site.

Soooooo, how do you find ‘em?

Turns out, a new Google Analytics feature can make it happen: Pivot table reports

Here’s how you do it:

  1. In Google Analytics, click ‘Content’.
  2. Click the ‘Top Content’ report:The top content reportYou’ll see a list of the most-viewed pages on your site. Not much help just yet.
  3. Now for the good stuff. At the top-right corner of the ‘Content Performance’ tab, click the ‘Pivot’ button:
    the pivot report button

  4. Change ‘Pivot by’ to medium. Leave ‘Showing’ set as ‘Pageviews’. You’ll get a new table showing pages as the rows, and the mediums (media? mediumses?) as the columns, like this:
    A pivot report

  5. Now, sort the ‘organic’ column ascending (lowest values first). You’ll see a nice, clear list of pages that haven’t received any clicks from organic search:
    the report, sorted by organic clicks, ascending

That’s it! You can take a look and find the pages getting zero organic clicks.

A few cautions:

  1. This report will not show pages with zero pageviews overall. If a page never received any pageviews, then the Google Analytics tracking bug never fired, and the page isn’t in Google’s reports.
  2. This data is a lot more helpful for pages that otherwise get lots of traffic. If a page gets 1 view overall and zero organic views, that may mean it’s got SEO issues. Or, it may mean that the page just sucks overall. Use your judgment.
  3. This is only 1/2 the battle. Don’t assume the invisible pages need optimization, and that all will be well. It’s possible that these pages simply shouldn’t be there, or that there’s a problem with how you’re linking to them, or something else. Use this report as a starting point. Not an end point.

Happy Analyzing!

Do you like this post? Yes No

Posted by wrttnwrd

One often-ignored part of SEO is making invisible pages visible. When I say 'invisible', I mean pages that have received zero clicks from organic search results.

If you can find those pages, you can decide:

  • To keep them, but work to raise their organic search profile;
  • To keep them, but use more of their link juice to help other, higher-profile pages on your site; 
  • Get rid of them, and 301 redirect them to higher-profile, higher-value pages on your site.

Soooooo, how do you find 'em?

Turns out, a new Google Analytics feature can make it happen: Pivot table reports

Here's how you do it:

  1. In Google Analytics, click 'Content'.

  2. Click the 'Top Content' report:The top content reportYou'll see a list of the most-viewed pages on your site. Not much help just yet.

  3. Now for the good stuff. At the top-right corner of the 'Content Performance' tab, click the 'Pivot' button:
    the pivot report button

  4. Change 'Pivot by' to medium. Leave 'Showing' set as 'Pageviews'. You'll get a new table showing pages as the rows, and the mediums (media? mediumses?) as the columns, like this:
    A pivot report

  5. Now, sort the 'organic' column ascending (lowest values first). You'll see a nice, clear list of pages that haven't received any clicks from organic search:
    the report, sorted by organic clicks, ascending

That's it! You can take a look and find the pages getting zero organic clicks.

A few cautions:

  1. This report will not show pages with zero pageviews overall. If a page never received any pageviews, then the Google Analytics tracking bug never fired, and the page isn't in Google's reports.
  2. This data is a lot more helpful for pages that otherwise get lots of traffic. If a page gets 1 view overall and zero organic views, that may mean it's got SEO issues. Or, it may mean that the page just sucks overall. Use your judgment.
  3. This is only 1/2 the battle. Don't assume the invisible pages need optimization, and that all will be well. It's possible that these pages simply shouldn't be there, or that there's a problem with how you're linking to them, or something else. Use this report as a starting point. Not an end point.
Happy Analyzing!

Do you like this post? Yes No

http://www.seomoz.org/blog

How To Get Past Last-Touch Attribution With Google Analytics

Posted by willcritchlow

In last week’s Whiteboard Friday "Kill the Head or Chase the Tail", Rand and I started by discussing how to gain true insight into what kind of keywords are leading people to discover your brand and ultimately driving conversions for your business (clue: it’s probably not branded search phrases, despite what your analytics reports are telling you). Today, I’m going to demonstrate one way of measuring this more accurately in Google Analytics.

The problem is well described by the ever-excellent Avinash Kaushik in his post entitled Measuring Upper Funnel Keywords (although nominally about paid search, his description applies perfectly well to natural search except you aren’t paying for traffic in the same way). It can be summarised by thinking about all those reports we have all seen showing branded search terms being the best-converting. While this is true in the sense that the individual finally converted after searching for the brand, it’s clearly not the way they found out about your services. For the purposes of setting strategy, you need to understand in better detail your "visitor acquisition" channels that eventually lead to conversions. Sam’s superb post on SEOmoz’s conversion rate lessons from 2009 touches on this in point 2.

Enter multi-touch analytics tracking.

Most analytics packages use last-touch attribution by default meaning that conversions are allocated to the most recent source of a visit for that visitor. We are interested here in first-touch attribution or even multi-touch attribution models to understand how visitors are influenced over time by repeated visits to the site. If you are interested in analytics packages that can track multiple touches ‘out of the box’, I recommend reading John Santangelo’s YOUmoz post on Google Analytics alternatives.

First-touch tracking in Google Analytics

Patrick at Blogstorm has written about over-riding last click attribution (something I also discussed in my presentation Analytics Every SEO Should Know that Scott linked to from the Whiteboard Friday). But this method only works when you can specify the exact URL of the landing page including parameters as it relies on the utm_nooverride parameter. This works fine for email and PPC traffic, but doesn’t help with tracking organic search traffic.

For this, we need a slightly more involved method.

In my presentation, I touched on the function setVar and a custom function called superSetVar, but in the updates announced in October last year, the GA team released a new function called setCustomVar that is now the best functionality to use. For this purpose we want to track variables at the visitor level.

In your GA tracking code, you want to check for the presence of the __utma cookie which will be present only if the user is a returning visitor. If it is not present, use the JavaScript variable document.referrer to set a visitor-level custom variable (named something like "original referrer") and use location.pathname to set a second visitor-level custom variable (named something like "original landing page"). Take care not to re-use custom variable slots you are using elsewhere in your analytics.

You will probably then want to add a filter to your analytics profile to convert the raw referrer into referring keywords using a filter like this one for getting detailed PPC keyword information (obviously not filtering only PPC traffic). You might also want to pull out the original source (which you can work out from the referrer and landing page) into a separate variable.

With this all set up, you will be able to run conversion reports by original keyword for a given original source and see conversion information based on first click attribution. I would expect that you would see the long-tail contributing far more than it does in the standard reports and branded search much less (not zero of course – there will still be first-touch branded searches driven by PR, offline marketing etc.).

Multi-touch attribution modelling

If you are feeling especially hardcore, you can dig even deeper into this whole mess by attempting to capture multiple touch-points. The idea here is that you want to give attribution for conversions not only to first- and last-touches but also give so-called assists to touch-points along the way (e.g. a conversion path could look like long-tail keyword > head keyword > branded search > direct visit – under this scenario, you might want to give the head and branded searches some attribution for the conversion).

This becomes especially important if you have different departments contributing to the marketing – you would like to be able to give some credit to the departments that bring the visitor in, some to the channels that keep the visitor returning and to the channel that finally converts them.

I haven’t set this up with the new GA functions, but the basic process would involve something similar to the superSetVar function for the new setCustomVar. The idea here would be to stuff repeat visit information into the custom variables. This information is almost certainly unusable via the interface and you will likely need to export to Excel and play there (most likely with Pivot Tables – you all know how much I love them – it’s a little while since we ran a conference call (that link is to a recording of the one I did on Excel) but I’m planning the next one so go and sign up if you aren’t already on that mailing list).

If you’re hardcore enough to really want this information, you can probably work out the details! If anyone has done it and wants to write up detailed instructions, I’ll happily update this post with a link to your explanation.

View-through conversions

The missing piece of the puzzle if you are doing multi-touch attribution modelling is giving ‘assists’ to branding events such as the viewing of a display advert (without a clickthrough). Rich, our PPC guru at Distilled, wrote an introduction to Google’s viewthrough conversion metric.

There are all kinds of privacy concerns in extending this further – but the data is out there to gather this kind of data across whole platforms (e.g. understanding search funnels that led to your site in the end). The signs are there that we are going to get ever more information like this – particularly out of Google who are obviously always looking for ways to persuade their customers to spend in areas outside (the generally cheaper) branded search!


I love analytics and statistics, so I’d love to hear your favourite tips and tricks in the comments.

I’m sure future conference calls in my schedule will involve analytics tips and tricks so go ahead and sign up if you’d like to hear when they are running. You also might be interested in a post I wrote about integrating Google Website Optimizer with Google Analytics on SearchEngineLand.

Do you like this post? Yes No

Posted by willcritchlow

In last week's Whiteboard Friday "Kill the Head or Chase the Tail", Rand and I started by discussing how to gain true insight into what kind of keywords are leading people to discover your brand and ultimately driving conversions for your business (clue: it's probably not branded search phrases, despite what your analytics reports are telling you). Today, I'm going to demonstrate one way of measuring this more accurately in Google Analytics.

The problem is well described by the ever-excellent Avinash Kaushik in his post entitled Measuring Upper Funnel Keywords (although nominally about paid search, his description applies perfectly well to natural search except you aren't paying for traffic in the same way). It can be summarised by thinking about all those reports we have all seen showing branded search terms being the best-converting. While this is true in the sense that the individual finally converted after searching for the brand, it's clearly not the way they found out about your services. For the purposes of setting strategy, you need to understand in better detail your "visitor acquisition" channels that eventually lead to conversions. Sam's superb post on SEOmoz's conversion rate lessons from 2009 touches on this in point 2.

Enter multi-touch analytics tracking.

Most analytics packages use last-touch attribution by default meaning that conversions are allocated to the most recent source of a visit for that visitor. We are interested here in first-touch attribution or even multi-touch attribution models to understand how visitors are influenced over time by repeated visits to the site. If you are interested in analytics packages that can track multiple touches 'out of the box', I recommend reading John Santangelo's YOUmoz post on Google Analytics alternatives.

First-touch tracking in Google Analytics

Patrick at Blogstorm has written about over-riding last click attribution (something I also discussed in my presentation Analytics Every SEO Should Know that Scott linked to from the Whiteboard Friday). But this method only works when you can specify the exact URL of the landing page including parameters as it relies on the utm_nooverride parameter. This works fine for email and PPC traffic, but doesn't help with tracking organic search traffic.

For this, we need a slightly more involved method.

In my presentation, I touched on the function setVar and a custom function called superSetVar, but in the updates announced in October last year, the GA team released a new function called setCustomVar that is now the best functionality to use. For this purpose we want to track variables at the visitor level.

In your GA tracking code, you want to check for the presence of the __utma cookie which will be present only if the user is a returning visitor. If it is not present, use the JavaScript variable document.referrer to set a visitor-level custom variable (named something like "original referrer") and use location.pathname to set a second visitor-level custom variable (named something like "original landing page"). Take care not to re-use custom variable slots you are using elsewhere in your analytics.

You will probably then want to add a filter to your analytics profile to convert the raw referrer into referring keywords using a filter like this one for getting detailed PPC keyword information (obviously not filtering only PPC traffic). You might also want to pull out the original source (which you can work out from the referrer and landing page) into a separate variable.

With this all set up, you will be able to run conversion reports by original keyword for a given original source and see conversion information based on first click attribution. I would expect that you would see the long-tail contributing far more than it does in the standard reports and branded search much less (not zero of course - there will still be first-touch branded searches driven by PR, offline marketing etc.).

Multi-touch attribution modelling

If you are feeling especially hardcore, you can dig even deeper into this whole mess by attempting to capture multiple touch-points. The idea here is that you want to give attribution for conversions not only to first- and last-touches but also give so-called assists to touch-points along the way (e.g. a conversion path could look like long-tail keyword > head keyword > branded search > direct visit - under this scenario, you might want to give the head and branded searches some attribution for the conversion).

This becomes especially important if you have different departments contributing to the marketing - you would like to be able to give some credit to the departments that bring the visitor in, some to the channels that keep the visitor returning and to the channel that finally converts them.

I haven't set this up with the new GA functions, but the basic process would involve something similar to the superSetVar function for the new setCustomVar. The idea here would be to stuff repeat visit information into the custom variables. This information is almost certainly unusable via the interface and you will likely need to export to Excel and play there (most likely with Pivot Tables - you all know how much I love them - it's a little while since we ran a conference call (that link is to a recording of the one I did on Excel) but I'm planning the next one so go and sign up if you aren't already on that mailing list).

If you're hardcore enough to really want this information, you can probably work out the details! If anyone has done it and wants to write up detailed instructions, I'll happily update this post with a link to your explanation.

View-through conversions

The missing piece of the puzzle if you are doing multi-touch attribution modelling is giving 'assists' to branding events such as the viewing of a display advert (without a clickthrough). Rich, our PPC guru at Distilled, wrote an introduction to Google's viewthrough conversion metric.

There are all kinds of privacy concerns in extending this further - but the data is out there to gather this kind of data across whole platforms (e.g. understanding search funnels that led to your site in the end). The signs are there that we are going to get ever more information like this - particularly out of Google who are obviously always looking for ways to persuade their customers to spend in areas outside (the generally cheaper) branded search!


I love analytics and statistics, so I'd love to hear your favourite tips and tricks in the comments.

I'm sure future conference calls in my schedule will involve analytics tips and tricks so go ahead and sign up if you'd like to hear when they are running. You also might be interested in a post I wrote about integrating Google Website Optimizer with Google Analytics on SearchEngineLand.


Do you like this post? Yes No

http://www.seomoz.org/blog

How Does Google Get Their Data For Ad Planner?

I think Google Ad Planner is pretty amazing and chock full of information. But to some webmasters, the information they have is either so accurate it is scary or totally off and worthless.

In a WebmasterWorld thread, Google AdSense representative, AdSenseAdvisor, replied to questions about where they source the data, how to opt out and what to do if the data is off. Let me quote what Google said:

To estimate website traffic we use a combination of two approaches:
1.) We extrapolate website traffic from sample data we collect from a variety of sources. For our sample data Google Ad Planner combines information from sources such as aggregated Google search data, opt-in anonymous Google Analytics data, opt-in external consumer panel data, and other third-party market research. The data is aggregated over millions of users and powered by computer algorithms; it doesn’t contain personally-identifiable information.

2.) Individual websites can opt-in their Google Analytics data to improve the accuracy of data displayed about their site in Ad Planner.

This methodology is similar to that of other 3rd party online measurement tools, which also use hybrid approaches that blend server side measured numbers with sample/panel based estimates.

Google Analytics Opt-in Data
@Cancellara – Did you opt-in your Analytics data into Ad Planner? We don’t use your Analytics data in Ad Planner unless you explicitly choose to share it. So unless you’ve chosen to opt-in your Google Analytics data to Ad Planner, it’s possible that the Ad Planner estimates are different than your Analytics statistics.

@Oxydada – When looking at your Analytics reports compared to Ad Planner, are you comparing US to US figures? Ad Planner by default shows US numbers while Analytics shows worldwide figures, so this could be the cause of the discrepancy.

@rashidjaved11 – Please file a ticket with our support teams and we’ll try to help diagnose your issue. http://www.google.com/support/adplanner/bin/request.py

@aish1108 – If you’ve checked everything and you’re sure your tags are on all your pages, then you should opt-in your data. The “low tag coverage” message is just a warning to tell people to check their tag coverage. It’s possible that our check is making an error since we’re basing it on Google crawl data and trying to detect your Analytics tags from the crawl. The data you see in your Analytics reports is what we’ll display in Ad Planner

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


I think Google Ad Planner is pretty amazing and chock full of information. But to some webmasters, the information they have is either so accurate it is scary or totally off and worthless.

In a WebmasterWorld thread, Google AdSense representative, AdSenseAdvisor, replied to questions about where they source the data, how to opt out and what to do if the data is off. Let me quote what Google said:

To estimate website traffic we use a combination of two approaches: 1.) We extrapolate website traffic from sample data we collect from a variety of sources. For our sample data Google Ad Planner combines information from sources such as aggregated Google search data, opt-in anonymous Google Analytics data, opt-in external consumer panel data, and other third-party market research. The data is aggregated over millions of users and powered by computer algorithms; it doesn't contain personally-identifiable information.

2.) Individual websites can opt-in their Google Analytics data to improve the accuracy of data displayed about their site in Ad Planner.

This methodology is similar to that of other 3rd party online measurement tools, which also use hybrid approaches that blend server side measured numbers with sample/panel based estimates.

Google Analytics Opt-in Data
@Cancellara - Did you opt-in your Analytics data into Ad Planner? We don't use your Analytics data in Ad Planner unless you explicitly choose to share it. So unless you've chosen to opt-in your Google Analytics data to Ad Planner, it's possible that the Ad Planner estimates are different than your Analytics statistics.

@Oxydada - When looking at your Analytics reports compared to Ad Planner, are you comparing US to US figures? Ad Planner by default shows US numbers while Analytics shows worldwide figures, so this could be the cause of the discrepancy.

@rashidjaved11 - Please file a ticket with our support teams and we'll try to help diagnose your issue. http://www.google.com/support/adplanner/bin/request.py

@aish1108 - If you've checked everything and you're sure your tags are on all your pages, then you should opt-in your data. The "low tag coverage" message is just a warning to tell people to check their tag coverage. It's possible that our check is making an error since we're basing it on Google crawl data and trying to detect your Analytics tags from the crawl. The data you see in your Analytics reports is what we'll display in Ad Planner

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


http://www.seroundtable.com/

Using Yahoo! Answers to Generate Leads – Does it Work?

Posted by drummerboy9000

This post was originally in YOUmoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author’s views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.


Inspired by a great post by Vaidhyanathan, I began answering questions on Yahoo! Answers near the beginning of this year. Since then I have answered over 50 questions, nearly always related to metal roofing. Nearly 12 months later I sat down and did a study to find out:

Was the time I was spending answering these questions resulting in a reasonable amount of usable leads?

On to the data:

From my 53 answers, I received 562 visits, with a bounce rate of 33.5%, spending an average of 3:03 per visit.

First I compared the conversion rates of Yahoo! Answers traffic with PPC rates from the same period:

Conversion rates - PPC vs. Yahoo Answers

(Conversions are either a customer filling out and submitting a form for more information, or clicking on a link to our contact page.)Data this chart was made from is available as an Excel spreadsheet here.

As you can see, the conversion rates from Yahoo! Answers are nowhere near those coming from our PPC campaigns. That being said, to accurately understand how much this traffic is worth, you need to find out the cost of this traffic per visitor.

Cost Per Visit from Yahoo! Answers

This data is available as an interactive Excel spreadsheet here.

The conversion rates for traffic from Yahoo! Answers are lower than those of PPC traffic, but the cost per visit is less. So to accurately compare them, we do some more number crunching:

Cost Per Lead Conversion - PPC vs. Yahoo Answers

(For privacy reasons I unfortunately can’t give you all the PPC data I would like to.)

So basically, for Best Buy Metals, it makes sense to continue spending time answering questions on Yahoo! Answers.

Important tip:

Don’t rush out to Yahoo! Answers and answer every question with a link to your website at the end!

Answer relevant questions in a non-spammy relevant way. Then include your website as a source at the end. You are the source, as a representative of your company, so this is not deceptive, and people don’t mind it. You can check out my Yahoo Answers profile here.

Coming soon… How to use Yahoo! Answers in a way that benefits your company and the Yahoo! Answers community – The complete guide.

 

Do you like this post? Yes No

Posted by drummerboy9000


Inspired by a great post by Vaidhyanathan, I began answering questions on Yahoo! Answers near the beginning of this year. Since then I have answered over 50 questions, nearly always related to metal roofing. Nearly 12 months later I sat down and did a study to find out:

Was the time I was spending answering these questions resulting in a reasonable amount of usable leads?

On to the data:

From my 53 answers, I received 562 visits, with a bounce rate of 33.5%, spending an average of 3:03 per visit.

First I compared the conversion rates of Yahoo! Answers traffic with PPC rates from the same period:

Conversion rates - PPC vs. Yahoo Answers

(Conversions are either a customer filling out and submitting a form for more information, or clicking on a link to our contact page.)Data this chart was made from is available as an Excel spreadsheet here.

As you can see, the conversion rates from Yahoo! Answers are nowhere near those coming from our PPC campaigns. That being said, to accurately understand how much this traffic is worth, you need to find out the cost of this traffic per visitor.

Cost Per Visit from Yahoo! Answers

This data is available as an interactive Excel spreadsheet here.

The conversion rates for traffic from Yahoo! Answers are lower than those of PPC traffic, but the cost per visit is less. So to accurately compare them, we do some more number crunching:

Cost Per Lead Conversion - PPC vs. Yahoo Answers

(For privacy reasons I unfortunately can't give you all the PPC data I would like to.)

So basically, for Best Buy Metals, it makes sense to continue spending time answering questions on Yahoo! Answers.

Important tip:

Don't rush out to Yahoo! Answers and answer every question with a link to your website at the end!

Answer relevant questions in a non-spammy relevant way. Then include your website as a source at the end. You are the source, as a representative of your company, so this is not deceptive, and people don't mind it. You can check out my Yahoo Answers profile here.

Coming soon... How to use Yahoo! Answers in a way that benefits your company and the Yahoo! Answers community - The complete guide.

 


Do you like this post? Yes No

http://www.seomoz.org/blog

Page 1 of 512345»

Seth Godin: Sliced Bread

Malcolm Gladwell: Outliers

Anthony Parinello: Your Price is Too High

© Kaboodle Ventures LLC 2009
Blog WebMastered by All in One Webmaster.